Today's Date: Add To Favorites
West Virginia Man Convicted of Child Pornography
Breaking Legal News | 2007/01/24 16:27

WASHINGTON – A Cross Lanes, W. Va. man has been convicted of producing, receiving, and possessing child pornography, Assistant Attorney General Alice S. Fisher of the Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney Charles T. Miller of the Southern District of West Virginia announced today.

Following a five-day jury trial that began last Wednesday, David A. Hicks was found guilty on two counts of producing child pornography, two additional counts of possessing child pornography, and one count of receiving child pornography over the Internet. The trial was held in U.S. District Court in Charleston, W. Va. and U.S. District Court Judge Joseph R. Goodwin presided.

The evidence presented at trial demonstrated that Hicks, a father of two girls under the age of ten, frequently had his older daughter’s friends spend the night as guests. Five of these juveniles, girls between the ages of nine and 12, testified that Hicks frequently took photos of them while they were at the home, commented on his ability to see through their clothing, walked in on them while they were changing or bathing, watched and photographed them through the blinds of the home while they were swimming in his pool, and physically touched more than one of them inappropriately. Hicks stored photos of the girls on his computer in a special archive folder, including photos of his daughter’s friends either nude or partially nude. The two charges of production of child pornography were based on two photos taken in Hicks’s bathtub that depicted one of the girls in a sexually suggestive position.

Evidence at trial also revealed that Hicks was a trained computer expert who maintained a computer in his bedroom that had four separate hard drives. These hard drives contained thousands of images and movies of children engaged in sexually explicit conduct. The images on these hard drives were the basis of one of the possession charges. Investigators also testified that they seized several CDs from Hicks’ bedroom that contained similar images of prepubescent children engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Finally, forensic analysis of the computers and CDs revealed that Hicks searched for sexually explicit movie clips of children using a peer-to-peer file-sharing program, and then downloaded the movie clips to his computer. Hicks’s use of the Internet to download movie clips containing graphic images of prepubescent children engaged in sexually explicit conduct was the basis of the receipt charge.

Sentencing is currently set for April 19, 2007. Hicks faces a minimum sentence of 15 years and up to 30 years in prison for each of the two production charges, a minimum sentence of 5 years and up to 15 years in prison for the receipt charge, and up to 10 years in prison for each of the two possession charges. The judge also approved the forfeiture of the child pornography and related computer equipment seized during the investigation.

This case was investigated by Special Agents Mike Ritzman and Jack Remaly of the FBI. The forensic analysis was conducted by Melinda Cash of the FBI’s Computer Analysis Response Team. The case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Anna Forbes of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of West Virginia and Trial Attorney Steve Grocki of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the Criminal Division.



[PREV] [1] ..[7867][7868][7869][7870][7871][7872][7873][7874][7875].. [8300] [NEXT]
All
Class Action
Bankruptcy
Biotech
Breaking Legal News
Business
Corporate Governance
Court Watch
Criminal Law
Health Care
Human Rights
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Law Center
Law Promo News
Legal Business
Legal Marketing
Litigation
Medical Malpractice
Mergers & Acquisitions
Political and Legal
Politics
Practice Focuses
Securities
Elite Lawyers
Tax
Featured Law Firms
Tort Reform
Venture Business News
World Business News
Law Firm News
Attorneys in the News
Events and Seminars
Environmental
Legal Careers News
Patent Law
Consumer Rights
International
Legal Spotlight
Current Cases
State Class Actions
Federal Class Actions
Amazon workers strike at mul..
TikTok asks Supreme Court to..
Supreme Court rejects Wiscon..
US inflation ticked up last ..
Court seems reluctant to blo..
Court will hear arguments ov..
Romanian court orders a reco..
Court backs Texas over razor..
New Hampshire courts hear 2 ..
PA high court orders countie..
Tight US House races in Cali..
North Carolina Attorney Gene..
Republicans take Senate majo..
What to know about the unpre..
A man who threatened to kill..


Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet.
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Lorain Elyria Divorce Lawyer
www.loraindivorceattorney.com
Legal Document Services in Los Angeles, CA
Best Legal Document Preparation
www.tllsg.com
Car Accident Lawyers
Sunnyvale, CA Personal Injury Attorney
www.esrajunglaw.com
East Greenwich Family Law Attorney
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Connecticut Special Education Lawyer
www.fortelawgroup.com
  Law Firm Directory
 
 
 
© ClassActionTimes.com. All rights reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Class Action Times as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Affordable Law Firm Web Design