Today's Date: Add To Favorites
Supreme Court challenges Seattle schools
Legal Business | 2007/06/29 07:38

A splintered Supreme Court ruling on school diversity leaves the Seattle School District where it has foundered the past six years - casting about for an acceptable way to maintain diverse and equitable schools. The 5-4 decision struck down Seattle's racial tiebreaker as well as an integration plan in Louisville, Ky. Justice Anthony Kennedy agreed with this result - along with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito - but departed from the majority opinion in a significant way. Their ruling, Kennedy wrote, was "at least open to the interpretation that the Constitution requires school districts to ignore the problem of de facto resegregation in schooling. I cannot endorse that conclusion. To the extent the plurality opinion suggests the Constitution mandates that state and local school authorities must accept the status quo of racial isolation in schools, it is, in my view, profoundly mistaken."

This page agrees. The legacy of past racial discrimination created a racially and economically segregated city on the edge of Puget Sound. Seattle has made long strides toward diversity but today's astronomical housing prices make further progress difficult.

The 46,000-student Seattle School District bears the brunt of these divisions. The district is divided along the Ship Canal into largely white, prosperous North End schools and, in the South End, heavily minority and often resource-poor schools.

Roberts' opinion, signed by the conservative justices, does not restrict a district's choice of where to build schools, where to add academic programs and how to allocate money, leaving open the possibility that these might be done with a purpose of racial diversity. Kennedy's opinion explicitly allows such a purpose.

Kennedy adds that if the district judged an applicant as an individual, "that might include race as a component." But what they cannot do, Kennedy said - and this is now federal law - is to place a racial label on a student and to assign the student to a school by "mechanical formula."

Seattle no longer does that. But the School Board will have to rise to the challenge of crafting a student-assignment plan that is fair and isn't blind to the inequality built along racial and socioeconomic lines.

Thursday, School Board President Cheryl Chow said the district has been extending high-quality programs such as the International Baccalaureate. The IB, which was available initially at Ingraham High School in the North End, is being extended to Sealth High School and Denny Middle School in Delridge. Foreign-language immersion, available initially at Stanford International School in Wallingford, will also be available at Concord Elementary in South Park.

The district's funding formula already favors South End schools and the needs are not satisfied. South End schools spend more on counselors, caseworkers and translators, and bonuses are offered to attract top teachers to work there.

The goal is excellence at every school. "We don't have that now," Chow said. The district needs to keep working on that problem, and in a way that is inclusive to all races and cultures.



[PREV] [1] ..[6660][6661][6662][6663][6664][6665][6666][6667][6668].. [8300] [NEXT]
All
Class Action
Bankruptcy
Biotech
Breaking Legal News
Business
Corporate Governance
Court Watch
Criminal Law
Health Care
Human Rights
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Law Center
Law Promo News
Legal Business
Legal Marketing
Litigation
Medical Malpractice
Mergers & Acquisitions
Political and Legal
Politics
Practice Focuses
Securities
Elite Lawyers
Tax
Featured Law Firms
Tort Reform
Venture Business News
World Business News
Law Firm News
Attorneys in the News
Events and Seminars
Environmental
Legal Careers News
Patent Law
Consumer Rights
International
Legal Spotlight
Current Cases
State Class Actions
Federal Class Actions
Amazon workers strike at mul..
TikTok asks Supreme Court to..
Supreme Court rejects Wiscon..
US inflation ticked up last ..
Court seems reluctant to blo..
Court will hear arguments ov..
Romanian court orders a reco..
Court backs Texas over razor..
New Hampshire courts hear 2 ..
PA high court orders countie..
Tight US House races in Cali..
North Carolina Attorney Gene..
Republicans take Senate majo..
What to know about the unpre..
A man who threatened to kill..


Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet.
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Lorain Elyria Divorce Lawyer
www.loraindivorceattorney.com
Legal Document Services in Los Angeles, CA
Best Legal Document Preparation
www.tllsg.com
Car Accident Lawyers
Sunnyvale, CA Personal Injury Attorney
www.esrajunglaw.com
East Greenwich Family Law Attorney
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Connecticut Special Education Lawyer
www.fortelawgroup.com
  Law Firm Directory
 
 
 
© ClassActionTimes.com. All rights reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Class Action Times as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Affordable Law Firm Web Design