Today's Date: Add To Favorites
Senator urges regulators to block XM-Sirius merger
Venture Business News | 2007/05/25 10:59

The chairman of the U.S. Senate's subcommittee on antitrust, competition policy and consumer rights is urging federal regulators to block the proposed merger of XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. and Sirius Satellite Radio Inc., saying the deal would cause "substantial harm to competition and consumers."  Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wis.) has sent a letter to Kevin Martin, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, and Thomas Barnett, assistant attorney general for the antitrust division at the Department of Justice, asking them to reject the deal combining the two satellite radio service providers.

"Elimination of the head-to-head competition currently offered by XM and Sirius leaving only a monopoly satellite radio service will likely result in higher prices and poorer service being offered to consumers," Kohl said. "Satellite radio is a unique service for which none of the other audio services is a substitute. Uncertain promises of competition from new technologies tomorrow do not protect consumers from higher prices today."

The FCC and Justice Department are currently reviewing the proposed deal. The FCC issued satellite radio licenses 10 years ago to D.C.-based XM (NASDAQ: XMSR) and New York-based Sirius (NASDAQ: SIRI) on the condition that the two companies would not combine their operations.

"I have concluded this merger, if permitted to proceed, would cause substantial harm to competition and consumers, would be contrary to antitrust law and not in the public interest, and therefore should be blocked by your agencies," Kohl said.

Analysts who follow the satellite radio industry have said that the merger is a long shot. Most analysts say the transaction, at best, has a 50 percent chance of getting regulatory approval.

XM spokesman Chance Patterson, in response to Kohl's comments, said that the "companies continue to believe that the regulatory agencies conducting formal reviews of the merger will conclude that the combination of Sirius and XM will increase programming choices and improve pricing for consumers, and that the audio entertainment market after the merger will remain robust, competitive and open to new entrants."



[PREV] [1] ..[6873][6874][6875][6876][6877][6878][6879][6880][6881].. [8290] [NEXT]
All
Class Action
Bankruptcy
Biotech
Breaking Legal News
Business
Corporate Governance
Court Watch
Criminal Law
Health Care
Human Rights
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Law Center
Law Promo News
Legal Business
Legal Marketing
Litigation
Medical Malpractice
Mergers & Acquisitions
Political and Legal
Politics
Practice Focuses
Securities
Elite Lawyers
Tax
Featured Law Firms
Tort Reform
Venture Business News
World Business News
Law Firm News
Attorneys in the News
Events and Seminars
Environmental
Legal Careers News
Patent Law
Consumer Rights
International
Legal Spotlight
Current Cases
State Class Actions
Federal Class Actions
Tight US House races in Cali..
North Carolina Attorney Gene..
Republicans take Senate majo..
What to know about the unpre..
A man who threatened to kill..
Ford cuts 2024 earnings guid..
Kenya’s deputy president pl..
South Korean court acquits f..
Supreme Court grapples with ..
Supreme Court leaves in plac..
Kentucky sheriff accused of ..
New rules regarding election..
North Carolina appeals court..
A court in Argentina orders ..
Mexican cartel leader’s son..


Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet.
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Lorain Elyria Divorce Lawyer
www.loraindivorceattorney.com
Legal Document Services in Los Angeles, CA
Best Legal Document Preparation
www.tllsg.com
Car Accident Lawyers
Sunnyvale, CA Personal Injury Attorney
www.esrajunglaw.com
East Greenwich Family Law Attorney
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Connecticut Special Education Lawyer
www.fortelawgroup.com
  Law Firm Directory
 
 
 
© ClassActionTimes.com. All rights reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Class Action Times as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Affordable Law Firm Web Design