Today's Date: Add To Favorites
SEC sues Mobile Ready and former co-CEOs
Securities | 2008/07/14 09:20

The Atlanta office of the Securities and Exchange Commission has filed a lawsuit against wireless software company Mobile Ready Entertainment Corp. and its former CEOs, alleging they ran a "micro-cap pump-and-dump" scheme using false press releases.

The suit claims Michael H. Magolnick and Craig A. Mora sent 16 separate press releases with false revenue projections, made-up contracts for future business and fake new profitable business relationships to boost the price of Alpharetta, Ga.-based Mobile Ready's stock.

In one example from January 2007, a press release from the company claimed the launch of a new text messaging service that would let Mobile Ready business clients market directly to mobile phones through text messaging.

"Mobile Ready subsidiary, Complete Identity has already been working closely with companies in the Direct Selling Association" and "company executives are confident that the industry relationship will yield several million dollars in new business," the release said.

Mobile Ready's (Pink Sheets: MRDY) stock trading volume jumped 300 percent the day after the release, giving Mora and Magolnick a better market in which to sell their restricted shares, the SEC said. But the SEC argues the defendants knew the company had no relationship with the Direct Selling Association and no reason to claim several million collars in new business.

In another release in February 2007, the company said it was projecting $10.1 million in revenue for 2007 and $14.8 million in 2008. The day after that release, the company's stock trading volume skyrocketed 550 percent, while the stock's value rose 57 percent to 11 cents a share.

The suit alleges that as the price of the stock increased following the fraudulent releases, Magolnick and Mora obtained bogus Rule 144 Opinion letters and improperly sold Mobile Ready shares for their personal gain.

Between April and July 2007, Magolnick sold about 2.1 million shares for $69,949. In the same period, Mora sold about 2.2 million shares for $72,589.

Magolnick was co-CEO of the company from December 2006 until his resignation in December 2007. Mora was co-CEO with Magolnick, but is now the company's chairman and CEO.

The SEC complaint wants antifraud injunctions against Mobile Ready, Magolnick and Mora, and registration injunctions, disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and O&D and penny-stock bars against Magolnick and Mora.



[PREV] [1] ..[4828][4829][4830][4831][4832][4833][4834][4835][4836].. [8292] [NEXT]
All
Class Action
Bankruptcy
Biotech
Breaking Legal News
Business
Corporate Governance
Court Watch
Criminal Law
Health Care
Human Rights
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Law Center
Law Promo News
Legal Business
Legal Marketing
Litigation
Medical Malpractice
Mergers & Acquisitions
Political and Legal
Politics
Practice Focuses
Securities
Elite Lawyers
Tax
Featured Law Firms
Tort Reform
Venture Business News
World Business News
Law Firm News
Attorneys in the News
Events and Seminars
Environmental
Legal Careers News
Patent Law
Consumer Rights
International
Legal Spotlight
Current Cases
State Class Actions
Federal Class Actions
New Hampshire courts hear 2 ..
PA high court orders countie..
Tight US House races in Cali..
North Carolina Attorney Gene..
Republicans take Senate majo..
What to know about the unpre..
A man who threatened to kill..
Ford cuts 2024 earnings guid..
Kenya’s deputy president pl..
South Korean court acquits f..
Supreme Court grapples with ..
Supreme Court leaves in plac..
Kentucky sheriff accused of ..
New rules regarding election..
North Carolina appeals court..


Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet.
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Lorain Elyria Divorce Lawyer
www.loraindivorceattorney.com
Legal Document Services in Los Angeles, CA
Best Legal Document Preparation
www.tllsg.com
Car Accident Lawyers
Sunnyvale, CA Personal Injury Attorney
www.esrajunglaw.com
East Greenwich Family Law Attorney
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Connecticut Special Education Lawyer
www.fortelawgroup.com
  Law Firm Directory
 
 
 
© ClassActionTimes.com. All rights reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Class Action Times as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Affordable Law Firm Web Design