Today's Date: Add To Favorites
SEC subpoenas Apple's Jobs in backdating probe
Securities | 2007/09/21 10:48
Apple CEO Steve Jobs' legal involvement in a stock-options backdating case isn't quite finished. According to Bloomberg News, the Securities and Exchange Commission has sent a subpoena to the technology visionary, asking him to give a deposition in its civil case against former Apple general counsel Nancy Heinen. Bloomberg cited two people familiar with the matter who wanted to remain anonymous because deposition subpoenas aren't public. Mark Fagel, associate regional director of the SEC's San Francisco office, wouldn't comment on whether Jobs had been issued a subpoena, but said the discovery process in the case against Heinen had begun. He expects that the SEC will start taking depositions in the case in November.

Last year, Apple joined about 200 public companies in admitting that some of the stock options granted to senior executives had been backdated to capture an immediate profit. Backdating stock options does not violate SEC rules, provided the company doing the backdating takes an appropriate accounting charge for the extra profit reaped by executives. In Apple's case, no such disclosures were made.

In late December, the company issued a carefully worded statement explaining that an investigation by an outside law firm into the matter found that while Jobs was aware of the backdating at Apple, he didn't understand the accounting significance of the practice.

Instead, the investigation's findings raised "serious questions" about the role of two former executives in the backdating. Although Apple didn't name the individuals, they were former CFO Fred Anderson and Heinen. In April, the SEC charged the two with violations of securities laws. At issue were two large grants of stock options to Jobs, both of which were backdated to maximize the profit for the CEO. The SEC says Anderson should have known that the backdating required special accounting treatment. As for Heinen, the SEC accused her of falsifying Apple's books and records, fabricating a board meeting that never took place to justify the backdating of the options.



[PREV] [1] ..[6158][6159][6160][6161][6162][6163][6164][6165][6166].. [8290] [NEXT]
All
Class Action
Bankruptcy
Biotech
Breaking Legal News
Business
Corporate Governance
Court Watch
Criminal Law
Health Care
Human Rights
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Law Center
Law Promo News
Legal Business
Legal Marketing
Litigation
Medical Malpractice
Mergers & Acquisitions
Political and Legal
Politics
Practice Focuses
Securities
Elite Lawyers
Tax
Featured Law Firms
Tort Reform
Venture Business News
World Business News
Law Firm News
Attorneys in the News
Events and Seminars
Environmental
Legal Careers News
Patent Law
Consumer Rights
International
Legal Spotlight
Current Cases
State Class Actions
Federal Class Actions
Tight US House races in Cali..
North Carolina Attorney Gene..
Republicans take Senate majo..
What to know about the unpre..
A man who threatened to kill..
Ford cuts 2024 earnings guid..
Kenya’s deputy president pl..
South Korean court acquits f..
Supreme Court grapples with ..
Supreme Court leaves in plac..
Kentucky sheriff accused of ..
New rules regarding election..
North Carolina appeals court..
A court in Argentina orders ..
Mexican cartel leader’s son..


Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet.
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Lorain Elyria Divorce Lawyer
www.loraindivorceattorney.com
Legal Document Services in Los Angeles, CA
Best Legal Document Preparation
www.tllsg.com
Car Accident Lawyers
Sunnyvale, CA Personal Injury Attorney
www.esrajunglaw.com
East Greenwich Family Law Attorney
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Connecticut Special Education Lawyer
www.fortelawgroup.com
  Law Firm Directory
 
 
 
© ClassActionTimes.com. All rights reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Class Action Times as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Affordable Law Firm Web Design