Today's Date: Add To Favorites
SEC Approves 2 Fund Trading Settlements
Securities | 2007/08/24 02:56

The Securities and Exchange Commission has approved two more settlements involving improper mutual-fund trading, with two former California hedge-fund managers agreeing to pay $275,000 to settle SEC charges. The SEC on Wednesday submitted for court approval a settlement with Brent Federighi, a former manager for hedge funds Ilytat and Gage, that calls for him to pay a $175,000 civil penalty and to be banned from working for an investment adviser for 18 months.

Separately, Michael Hoffman, 44 years old, who founded Ilytat, agreed to pay a $100,000 civil penalty and accepted an 18-month ban on working for an investment adviser. Both men settled without admitting or denying wrongdoing.

The SEC had accused Federighi of fraud in connection with "late trading" the practice of buying mutual fund shares after the 4 p.m. close of trading while receiving that day's closing price. The SEC found that Hoffman aided and abetted Bear Stearns & Co., which had allegedly processed the improper trades over a two-year period starting in 2000. Bear Stearns more than a year ago agreed to pay $250 million to settle related SEC charges, including a $90 million civil penalty that was the biggest imposed on a brokerage firm under SEC Chairman Christopher Cox.

"Mr. Federighi is delighted to have this matter resolved," his lawyer, William Goodman, said. "He is looking forward to re-entering the industry once the terms of the injunction have been complied with."

Hoffman closed Ilytat in 2002. Shortly after, Federighi started Gage. Gage operated until September 2003, when allegations of widespread mutual-fund trading abuses surfaced.

A lawyer for Federighi declined to comment. Tarek Helou, a lawyer for Hoffman, said that "Mr. Hoffman put an end to these trading practices at his firm more than five years ago. He did so long before it became a public issue, and he cooperated fully with the SEC. He is pleased that this is now behind him and is focused on moving forward."



[PREV] [1] ..[6310][6311][6312][6313][6314][6315][6316][6317][6318].. [8290] [NEXT]
All
Class Action
Bankruptcy
Biotech
Breaking Legal News
Business
Corporate Governance
Court Watch
Criminal Law
Health Care
Human Rights
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Law Center
Law Promo News
Legal Business
Legal Marketing
Litigation
Medical Malpractice
Mergers & Acquisitions
Political and Legal
Politics
Practice Focuses
Securities
Elite Lawyers
Tax
Featured Law Firms
Tort Reform
Venture Business News
World Business News
Law Firm News
Attorneys in the News
Events and Seminars
Environmental
Legal Careers News
Patent Law
Consumer Rights
International
Legal Spotlight
Current Cases
State Class Actions
Federal Class Actions
Tight US House races in Cali..
North Carolina Attorney Gene..
Republicans take Senate majo..
What to know about the unpre..
A man who threatened to kill..
Ford cuts 2024 earnings guid..
Kenya’s deputy president pl..
South Korean court acquits f..
Supreme Court grapples with ..
Supreme Court leaves in plac..
Kentucky sheriff accused of ..
New rules regarding election..
North Carolina appeals court..
A court in Argentina orders ..
Mexican cartel leader’s son..


Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet.
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Lorain Elyria Divorce Lawyer
www.loraindivorceattorney.com
Legal Document Services in Los Angeles, CA
Best Legal Document Preparation
www.tllsg.com
Car Accident Lawyers
Sunnyvale, CA Personal Injury Attorney
www.esrajunglaw.com
East Greenwich Family Law Attorney
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Connecticut Special Education Lawyer
www.fortelawgroup.com
  Law Firm Directory
 
 
 
© ClassActionTimes.com. All rights reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Class Action Times as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Affordable Law Firm Web Design