Today's Date: Add To Favorites
Jim Cooney & Mike Barnhill to Work Sheriff Controversy
Law Firm News | 2008/01/05 10:12
Mecklenburg County officials, fearing a lawsuit over the controversy-filled effort to select a new sheriff, have hired a high-powered law firm and one of the state's highest-profile litigators to defend them.

Parks Helms, vice chairman of the county commissioners, said Friday that Charlotte attorney Jim Cooney will be one of the lawyers to defend the county should the sheriff's selection process wind up in court.

The latest legal question was raised Friday, when county commissioner Dan Bishop, a lawyer, sent a letter to county attorney Marvin Bethune questioning the constitutionality of the process the Mecklenburg Democratic Party's executive committee used when it chose Charlotte lawyer Nick Mackey as sheriff.

He cited several federal court cases that held that when a political party exercises a public electoral function such as nominating candidates to fill vacancies, it must follow federal election law.

In the special election last month, precinct representatives had weighted votes based on the precinct's votes for Democratic Gov. Mike Easley in 2004. For example, a precinct that cast 1,000 votes for Easley got 10 votes in the sheriff's contest.

Bishop says that flies in the face of the federal standard for "one man, one vote."

He wants the issue to be added to the Jan. 15 county commissioners meeting agenda.

Bethune said late Friday that, depending on the amount of research required, the entire board might have to authorize him to research the issue, and he wasn't sure if he would have to seek outside help.

The county hired Cooney to work on the sheriff controversy about two weeks ago, said Michelle Lancaster, an associate general manager for the county. Mike Barnhill, a Charlotte lawyer who has previously handled litigation for the county, is also working on the case. Cooney and Barnhill work for Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, a firm with more than 500 lawyers.

Cooney most recently made headlines nationally as the attorney for Reade Seligmann, one of the Duke University lacrosse players charged in a racially charged sexual assault case. The players were exonerated, and prosecutor Mike Nifong has been disbarred.

Barnhill and Cooney are researching laws on the Mecklenburg sheriff's election, and are being paid $360 per hour, Lancaster said. She added that the lawyers give the county a good rate, considering they normally charge "in the $500 (per hour) range."

Helms and Jennifer Roberts, who chairs the commission, said the county has to proceed carefully on the issue. James Ferguson, a prominent Charlotte civil rights lawyer, has suggested he will sue the county if Mackey isn't named sheriff.

Other legal challenges could come as well, Helms added. If a sheriff is improperly selected, inmates could file challenges arguing they were unlawfully held.

Controversy has percolated for weeks surrounding the selection of a replacement for former sheriff Jim Pendergraph, who left Dec. 1 to take a job in Washington, D.C.

Mackey won the Democratic party's Dec. 6 election. But concerns have been raised about the former Charlotte-Mecklenburg police officer. He resigned from the force in 2003 while under internal investigation for allegedly falsifying hours worked.

A majority of commissioners, who would have to confirm Mackey as sheriff, have said they want to wait until the state Democrats rule on two grievances challenging Mackey's election.

Republican commissioners this week raised the possibility that the commission can legally bypass Mackey.

Bethune, the county attorney, originally told commissioners state law required the Democratic Party to pick Pendergraph's replacement.

But now Bethune and the Womble Carlyle lawyers are pointing to a second state law -- one that appears to give commissioners, not the Party, power to pick the new sheriff.

Commissioners report that their lawyers have said a 2005 N.C. Court of Appeals ruling gives precedence to the law that says the commissioners pick the sheriff. The ruling cites one of the laws in saying that if a sheriff wishes to resign, the commissioners appoint a new sheriff. In the next sentence, the ruling cites the other law and adds: "if a vacancy occurs for any other reason, it remains the responsibility of the county commissioners to select a new sheriff."

But other N.C. election law experts disagree. They note that the 2005 ruling came in a civil rights case filed by a Robeson County jail inmate, not an elections law case.


[PREV] [1] ..[5546][5547][5548][5549][5550][5551][5552][5553][5554].. [8286] [NEXT]
All
Class Action
Bankruptcy
Biotech
Breaking Legal News
Business
Corporate Governance
Court Watch
Criminal Law
Health Care
Human Rights
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Law Center
Law Promo News
Legal Business
Legal Marketing
Litigation
Medical Malpractice
Mergers & Acquisitions
Political and Legal
Politics
Practice Focuses
Securities
Elite Lawyers
Tax
Featured Law Firms
Tort Reform
Venture Business News
World Business News
Law Firm News
Attorneys in the News
Events and Seminars
Environmental
Legal Careers News
Patent Law
Consumer Rights
International
Legal Spotlight
Current Cases
State Class Actions
Federal Class Actions
A man who threatened to kill..
Ford cuts 2024 earnings guid..
Kenya’s deputy president pl..
South Korean court acquits f..
Supreme Court grapples with ..
Supreme Court leaves in plac..
Kentucky sheriff accused of ..
New rules regarding election..
North Carolina appeals court..
A court in Argentina orders ..
Mexican cartel leader’s son..
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs jailed ..
Alaska man charged with send..
Protesters storm Mexico’s S..
Google faces new antitrust t..


Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet.
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Lorain Elyria Divorce Lawyer
www.loraindivorceattorney.com
Legal Document Services in Los Angeles, CA
Best Legal Document Preparation
www.tllsg.com
Car Accident Lawyers
Sunnyvale, CA Personal Injury Attorney
www.esrajunglaw.com
East Greenwich Family Law Attorney
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Connecticut Special Education Lawyer
www.fortelawgroup.com
  Law Firm Directory
 
 
 
© ClassActionTimes.com. All rights reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Class Action Times as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Affordable Law Firm Web Design