Today's Date: Add To Favorites
Dell financing arm finds deficiencies
Securities | 2007/04/04 08:11

Dell Financial Services (DFS) has found and reported several operational deficiencies in its business, including the way it has posted customer payments, collected on delinquent accounts and failed to reconcile some accounts on a timely basis, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the company's primary financing partner.

The report filed by CIT Group's collateral unit, which has funded some DFS operations, is among the first under new, more stringent rules enacted by the SEC that are designed to provide greater detail to investors in asset-backed securities, securities that provide cash for many credit and leasing operations.

The items spelled out do not involve accounting issues.

Gavan Goss, DFS' chief financial officer, told CRN the issues involved have either been fixed or are in the process of being fixed.

DFS is a joint venture between Dell and CIT Group and has become Dell's US$6 billion-a-year financing arm. According to CIT Group's disclosure, DFS fell short of complying with its role under the financing terms in a US$1 billion asset-backed securitization sale, including the following:

A failure to make sure its third-party "lockbox vendors" - like banks - completely and accurately met compliance reporting requirements. DFS reported this as a "material deficiency" in this aspect of its operation, according to the CIT filing.

DFS reported "certain loss mitigation or recovery actions that were not initiated, conducted or concluded in accordance with the required time frames established under the transaction agreement," according to the CIT disclosure.

DFS took more than an allotted 90 days to reconcile certain accounts last year.

Through the middle of last year, DFS had about US$6 billion in assets under management, and the unit has become strategic to Dell's long-term plans. In addition to providing credit and financing so customers can buy its products, Dell executives have said DFS offers a competitive advantage to rivals because it gives the company an ongoing touch point with customers during the life of a product or a financing agreement.

As of Dell's most recent financial reports last year, computer and service sales through DFS accounted for more than 10 percent of Dell's total revenue. And while Dell owns 70 percent of the joint venture with CIT, it has an agreement to buy the rest of DFS outright as early as next year.

DFS executives told financial analysts in a teleconference last year that about half of its financing activity was conducted with commercial customers, and about half through consumers.



[PREV] [1] ..[7260][7261][7262][7263][7264][7265][7266][7267][7268].. [8242] [NEXT]
All
Class Action
Bankruptcy
Biotech
Breaking Legal News
Business
Corporate Governance
Court Watch
Criminal Law
Health Care
Human Rights
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Law Center
Law Promo News
Legal Business
Legal Marketing
Litigation
Medical Malpractice
Mergers & Acquisitions
Political and Legal
Politics
Practice Focuses
Securities
Elite Lawyers
Tax
Featured Law Firms
Tort Reform
Venture Business News
World Business News
Law Firm News
Attorneys in the News
Events and Seminars
Environmental
Legal Careers News
Patent Law
Consumer Rights
International
Legal Spotlight
Current Cases
State Class Actions
Federal Class Actions
TikTok content creators sue ..
Abortion consumes US politic..
Trump faces prospect of addi..
Retrial of Harvey Weinstein ..
Starbucks appears likely to ..
Supreme Court will weigh ban..
Judge in Trump case orders m..
Court makes it easier to sue..
Top Europe rights court cond..
Elon Musk will be investigat..
Retired Supreme Court Justic..
The Man Charged in an Illino..
Texas’ migrant arrest law w..
Former Georgia insurance com..
Alabama woman who faked kidn..


Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet.
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Lorain Elyria Divorce Lawyer
www.loraindivorceattorney.com
Legal Document Services in Los Angeles, CA
Best Legal Document Preparation
www.tllsg.com
Car Accident Lawyers
Sunnyvale, CA Personal Injury Attorney
www.esrajunglaw.com
East Greenwich Family Law Attorney
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Connecticut Special Education Lawyer
www.fortelawgroup.com
  Law Firm Directory
 
 
 
© ClassActionTimes.com. All rights reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Class Action Times as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Affordable Law Firm Web Design