|
|
|
Nixon Peabody Names Richard Langan Jr. as CEO
Law Firm News |
2008/01/07 11:34
|
Nixon Peabody LLP said Monday it named Richard Langan Jr. to take over the law firm as chief executive and managing partner.
He will move into his new role May 1, succeeding Harry Trueheart III, who has been at the helm for more than 13 years and will become the firm's nonexecutive chairman.
In Trueheart's new capacity, he will focus on client relationships, firm strategy and special projects, according to a company statement.
A Nixon Peabody spokeswoman said the New York-based international law firm's largest offices are in New York, D.C., Boston and San Francisco. The firm employs 700 attorneys. It has 110 attorneys in D.C., according to Washington Business Journal research.
Langan joined Nixon Peabody in 1980 as a first-year associate. He was most recently chair of the firm's business and financial services department. Langan is also a director of Minetta Brook, a non-for-profit arts foundation in New York.
About three months ago, the firm appointed Karen Greenbaum chief operating officer. She formerly was president and chief operating officer for Mercer LLC's U.S. operations. Greenbaum replaced John Gerhard, who announced his retirement after 25 years with the firm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spilman Law Firm Joins World Services Group
Law Firm News |
2008/01/07 11:29
|
Spilman Thomas & Battle announced it has joined World Services Group, a network that provides access to the services of other members.
The World Services Group provides a local, regional, national and global forum for communication, information exchange, networking and identification of business expansion opportunities, Spilman said. This is accomplished through peer-to-peer networking, professional development and annual conferences.
Spilman said it is the exclusive West Virginia law firm member of World Services Group. There are more than 130 member firms. The firms operate in more than 115 countries and throughout the United States.
Eric Iskra, Spilman's member in charge of client relations, said in a prepared statement that after researching the opportunity to join World Services Group, "we could only come to one conclusion - that membership would reap huge benefits for our clients. We are also pleased that this network does not limit us to the West Virginia boundaries, but allows our clients to benefit throughout our region."
Spilman, headquartered in Charleston, has offices in Morgantown and Wheeling; Pittsburgh.; Winston-Salem, N.C.; and Roanoke, Va |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crowell & Moring Add Partner in Irvine Office
Law Firm News |
2008/01/07 11:27
|
Crowell & Moring LLP is pleased to announce the addition of partner Karen A. Gibbs to the firm's Irvine, California office. Gibbs joins Crowell & Moring's Antitrust Group and will anchor the firm's Health Care Group on the West Coast. She previously
held the position of lead in-house counsel at Applied Medical, a privately-held global medical device company headquartered in California.
Gibbs represents companies in the medical device, pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other health care and life science sectors. She also has successfully represented companies in the airline, computer hardware and software, currency exchange, food and beverage, office products, sports equipment and telecommunications industries. Gibbs focuses on antitrust and unfair competition litigation, anti-kickback and false claims matters, sales and marketing ethics, patent and trade secret disputes, the intersection of antitrust and intellectual property law, licensing disputes, non-compete and employment disputes, and distribution transactions and disputes.
"Karen is a major talent and we are very happy to have her on board," said Steven P. Rice, head of Crowell & Moring's California office. "Her track record in representing health care and life science companies makes her an important legal player in the industry. She will anchor the firm's health care practice in California and complement our existing antitrust, commercial litigation and intellectual property capabilities."
Gibbs said, "I joined Crowell & Moring, because, in addition to its noted strengths in antitrust, health care, intellectual property and complex litigation, the firm has a prominent Washington, DC presence and global focus. I also wanted to join a firm whose culture fosters team work and creativity to deliver outstanding client service to companies of all sizes, from start ups to Fortune 50 companies."
At Applied Medical, Gibbs headed the legal and contracts departments, managed all trial and litigation matters and provided general counsel to all of the company's operational groups and global subsidiaries. Her in-house experience provides her with insight into the challenges in-house business and legal teams face in an increasingly globally-competitive environment.
"There are increasingly intense competitive, distribution and compliance challenges in health care," said Gibbs. "Having counseled and represented a number of health care companies over the years and also having been an industry insider at a highly-competitive, global company for nearly five years, I understand the pressures in-house legal and business teams face to meet these challenges. My role is to help these teams and their companies meet these challenges using creative and multidisciplinary approaches."
Before joining Applied Medical, Gibbs practiced antitrust, intellectual property and commercial litigation with major law firms in Southern California and the Silicon Valley. In addition to representing Applied Medical both as outside and in-house counsel in multiple litigation matters and trials, Gibbs has successfully represented Amgen, Interpore Cross International (now Biomet), Sun Microsystems, Electronics for Imaging, Travelex Currency Services, and numerous other well-known companies.
Gibbs received her B.A. with a double major in Law & Society (Political Science) and Psychology from the University of California at Santa Barbara, with Distinction, Phi Beta Kappa and High Honors. She received her J.D. from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law. During law school, Gibbs was Editor-in-Chief of the Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal and also a judicial extern to the Honorable Joseph T. Sneed III of the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Crowell & Moring LLP is a full-service law firm with more than 350 lawyers practicing in litigation, antitrust, government contracts, health care, labor and employment, corporate, intellectual property and more than 40 other practice areas. More than two-thirds of the firm's attorneys regularly litigate disputes on behalf of domestic and international corporations, start-up businesses, and individuals. Crowell & Moring's extensive client work ranges from advising on one of the world's largest telecommunications mergers to representing governments and corporations on international arbitration matters. Based in Washington, D.C., the firm also has offices in California, New York, London, and Brussels. Visit Crowell & Moring online at
www.crowell.com. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ulmer & Berne Elects 7 New Partners
Law Firm News |
2008/01/06 11:13
|
Ulmer & Berne LLP, which is celebrating its 100th anniversary in 2008, announced today the election of seven attorneys to the partnership. Attorneys include John M. Alten, Christopher D. Cathey, Paul J. Cosgrove, Rebecca B. Jacobs, Eric M. Robbins, Richik Sarkar and Wayne M. Serra. Detailed information on the attorneys is below.
John M. Alten of the Firm’s Cleveland office focuses his practice on complex business litigation, product liability and financial services litigation. Mr. Alten represents public and private companies and individuals in all aspects of business litigation, including disputes related to contracts, licensing, securities, product liability, construction, insurance, consumer law and corporate control. He is well-versed in all forms of alternative dispute resolution.
Christopher D. Cathey of the Firm’s Cincinnati office focuses his practice on civil litigation with an emphasis on commercial, financial services, employment, creditors’ rights, and personal injury litigation. His experience includes successfully defending financial institutions and other business entities on contractual, commercial and consumer finance disputes. Mr. Cathey handles a broad range of employment litigation including non-competition, trade secret and defense of employee wrongful termination claims. He also represents individuals and self-insured corporations in tort and insurance claims involving wrongful death, catastrophic injuries and toxic torts. Mr. Cathey was recognized as an “Ohio Super Lawyer Rising Star” by Law & Politics and Cincinnati magazines (2006-2007).
Paul J. (P.J.) Cosgrove of the Firm’s Cincinnati office represents medical device, pharmaceutical, and other manufacturers in product liability claims on a local, regional and national level. Mr. Cosgrove has represented manufacturers in defense of claims involving products such as latex gloves, infusion sets, catheters and prosthetic devices. He also represents companies in defense of claims involving dietary supplements, antidepressants, diabetes drugs, and a variety of cardiac drugs in response to government investigations. He handles all phases of the defense of complex cases, including presuit risk management and counseling, fact and expert depositions, electronic discovery, dispositive motion practice, Daubert challenges, mediation, trial and appeal. Outside the context of life sciences product liability litigation, Mr. Cosgrove represents companies in defense of catastrophic loss claims involving a variety of products including pipelines, fireplaces, cranes and airplanes, and also is involved in commercial litigation. He was recognized as an “Ohio Super Lawyer Rising Star” by Law & Politics and Cincinnati magazines (2007).
Rebecca B. Jacobs of the Firm’s Columbus office is a certified specialist in employment and labor law. She represents businesses on employment-related matters, including wrongful discharge, discrimination, harassment, retaliation, employee leave, and wage and hour issues. She routinely counsels clients on issues relating to compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, and other federal and state statutes. She has created and performed training sessions on topics such as sexual harassment, pregnancy discrimination, and employee leave laws. Ms. Jacobs assists clients in developing employee policies and independent contractor agreements. Ms. Jacobs also handles ERISA litigation and represents financial institutions on issues including business litigation. She was named an “Ohio Super Lawyer Rising Star” by Law & Politics and Cincinnati magazines (2006-2007).
Eric M. Robbins of the Firm’s Cincinnati office focuses his practice on intellectual property. He counsels individual and corporate clients as to securement, ownership, licensing, avoidance of infringement, dispute resolution, and enforcement of patents, trademarks and copyrights. He also prepares and facilitates ongoing prosecution of patent applications at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in the electrical, mechanical, and computer science arts. Mr. Robbins’ patent litigation experience includes Federal Court and International Trade Commission cases. He has previously been named an “Ohio Super Lawyer Rising Star” by Law & Politics and Cincinnati magazines.
Richik Sarkar of the Firm’s Cleveland office focuses his practice on business litigation, complex litigation and public law with expertise in business torts, contracts, corporate governance, securities and finance, real estate, real property taxation and education law. He represents financial institutions, school districts and various public and private corporations. Mr. Sarkar also works on alternative dispute resolution in the areas of commercial, product liability and public law. He is extremely active with Banking Law, Uniform Commercial Code, and Consumer Financial Services committees of the ABA Business Law Section and is on the Executive Board for the Business Law Section’s Young Lawyer Forum. Mr. Sarkar was recognized as an “Ohio Super Lawyer Rising Star” by Law & Politics and Cincinnati magazines (2005-2007).
Wayne M. Serra of the Firm’s Cleveland office practices in the areas of intellectual property creation and enforcement, with emphasis on software and computing device patents. Along with having represented two of the top United States patent filers, Mr. Serra has also counseled mid-sized and emerging companies on a wide variety of IP matters, including strategic portfolio advice, enforcement of intellectual property rights, and the evaluation, management, and monetization of patent portfolios. Mr. Serra previously served as Senior Intellectual Property Counsel for a medical imaging system manufacturer that is one of the top 200 companies in the Fortune Global 500. His experience also includes a substantial amount of patent litigation, licensing, and due diligence for technology transactions.
Ulmer & Berne LLP, established in 1908, is one of Ohio’s largest law firms. In 2007, the Firm was recognized in The BTI Consulting Group’s survey of corporate counsel as one of only 85 firms nationally that “delivers the best value for the dollar.” Also, in a survey of Fortune 500 companies by Corporate Counsel magazine, Ulmer & Berne has been chosen as a Go-To Law Firm® for both 2007 and 2008. Less than one-half of one percent of all the law firms in the US and abroad received this distinction.
A full-service Firm with 180 attorneys in Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati and Chicago, Ulmer & Berne represents publicly traded and privately held companies, financial institutions, pharmaceutical companies, family businesses, international joint ventures and affiliations, investor groups, start-ups and emerging businesses, public bodies and nonprofit organizations. For more information, visit www.ulmer.com. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broward Sheriff Questions Law Firm's Audit
Law Firm News |
2008/01/06 10:30
|
The Broward Sheriff's Office paid more than $1.3 million to a law firm with close ties to ex-sheriff Ken Jenne to do an audit of the agency's mishandling of its crime statistics -- but the firm never submitted a final report because BSO never asked for one.
Fort Lauderdale attorney Tom Panza's work over three years appears to duplicate much of the internal and outside reviews done by the FBI, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, a Tallahassee academic group and BSO itself, according to sheriff's office officials.
The Broward state attorney's office launched a probe in October 2003 into allegations that BSO deputies manipulated crime statistics, in part by doctoring its numbers through the use of ''exceptional clearances.'' An exceptional clearance is when a crime is deemed solved despite the lack of an arrest.
Broward Sheriff Al Lamberti, who replaced Jenne after he pleaded guilty to public corruption charges in September, questioned whether the agency gained anything from Panza's work.
''He was paid a lot of money and BSO employees did most of the work,'' Lamberti said.
A team of sheriff's deputies reviewed clearance reports from several BSO districts and recorded their findings for Panza's firm to analyze, Lamberti said.
Panza, a personal friend of Jenne's, initially was hired to conduct a review of more than 10,000 criminal cases cleared by BSO deputies between 2001 and 2003. Panza's law firm was also retained to review the agency's recommended discipline for some 40 BSO deputies and to handle subpoena requests by the state attorney's office.
Panza's firm did exactly what Jenne requested, said Ed Dion, BSO's former general counsel, who left his post in October. The firm made many contributions, such as creating protocols for deputies to follow while probing the clearances, he said.
''His firm showed the deputies what to look for during their investigation,'' Dion said. ``Ken Jenne wanted an independent review and he wanted to find out where the problems were and how high up they went.''
Panza, whose law firm has performed audits for healthcare and other companies, strongly disagreed with Lamberti's assessment of his work.
''We were never charged with writing their policy and procedures [manual],'' Panza said. ``We were charged with determining they were deficient.''
Jenne, who is now serving a one-year prison term unconnected to the crime statistics probe, authorized the hiring of Panza's firm in the fall of 2004, when his agency was under a cloud of suspicion. There was no letter of retention that spelled out the scope of the work -- including goals, timetable and final audit.
When public agencies hire outside consultants to review a problem area, audits are routinely produced with recommended solutions. Indeed, a few months before hiring Panza, BSO paid about $100,000 to the nonpartisan Collins Center for Public Policy at Florida State University for a report on the agency's flawed crime reporting, which led to sweeping reforms.
Tony Alfieri, director of the University of Miami School of Law's Center for Ethics & Public Service, said ''the better practice'' would have been for BSO to establish a ''clearer scope'' of work with Panza's law firm at the beginning.
''The vagueness of the representation . . . casts doubt on the reasonableness of the hours billed,'' Alfieri said.
He suggested an ''independent review of the history of this relationship'' to determine whether Panza's firm should reimburse any money to BSO.
`NOT EXCESSIVE'
Panza sharply contested that view of his total billable hours and fees, which ranged from $125 to $250 an hour. ''They were not excessive,'' he said.
In the end, Panza said, his firm did not write up the final audit, even though he told The Miami Herald in spring 2005 that he would do so after the state attorney's office completed its criminal investigations.
Dion told The Miami Herald a final report wasn't needed.
''We didn't need a final report because Panza was sharing his findings with me and the sheriff,'' Dion explained.
Panza's law partner, Susan Maurer, who coordinated the firm's computer analyses of BSO's cleared cases, said they did a ''credible job'' that led to lasting reforms in the agency's policy and procedures manual.
But BSO officials say many of those reforms -- including suspending the use of a controversial database tool called Powertrac that pinpointed crime patterns -- had already been implemented by the sheriff's office by early 2005 amid harsh criticism of BSO's case clearance policy.
While BSO officials said Panza's work was helpful, the agency based much of its revised policy and procedures manual on recommendations by the Collins Center, the independent academic group.
''Nearly all of the information we used in our new law enforcement manual that I worked on in 2005 and 2006 came from the recommendations in the Collins Center report,'' BSO Maj. John Carroll said, including training for detectives in preparing clearance reports.
Patricia Windowmaker, BSO's compliance officer who worked on the policy manuals, agreed with Carroll.
She said that while Panza's work was ''helpful in some aspects,'' including creating an audit tool for detectives to use for investigative check lists, it was the BSO team that identified the questionable cases and deputies for internal affairs review.
''The team had to weed through all the clearances. We ended up sending 100 cases to internal affairs and as a result of the investigative team, BSO's internal affairs division opened 57 administrative cases involving 61 deputies,'' she said.
REPORT NOT FINAL
Windowmaker's report on the case clearances, policy reforms and disciplinary action meted out to deputies will be finalized when the state attorney's investigation is officially closed.
The report, now in a draft form, reached this conclusion: Windowmaker said that eight deputies found to have violated BSO policy were terminated, 19 deputies received suspensions and two received written reprimands.
In the criminal investigation, the state attorney charged six sheriff's deputies -- five of them from Weston -- with official misconduct and other offenses. Two of them pleaded guilty to lesser charges, one was acquitted and charges were dismissed against a fourth. Only one is awaiting trial.
Panza's law firm sent associates from his firm to sit in on all court proceedings involving the state attorney's case against BSO at a cost of tens of thousands of dollars.
Windowmaker said Panza's team did help with coordinating the turnover of agency records to the state attorney's office in connection with the criminal probe after relations became strained between BSO and the state attorney's office.
Windowmaker, a lawyer, said she was skeptical at first about an outsider, Panza's firm, handling the BSO subpoenas because the agency routinely did that work.
But she said the task grew so ''expansive'' that ''it was helpful having someone on the inside and someone on the outside'' dealing with some 900 subpoenas for more than one million records and e-mails.
''Tom Panza acted like a go-between, a buffer,'' she said. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foley & Lardner Get the OK to Practice in China
Law Firm News |
2008/01/06 10:27
|
Foley & Lardner LLP, a law firm with a practice in Detroit specializing in the automotive sector, has received permission from the Chinese government to open an office in Shanghai.
A few years ago, the firm began to sense a need to open a branch in China as it saw a growing number of Chinese companies interested in doing business in the United States -- and in Michigan -- and heard from its U.S. clients needing legal assistance navigating China's expanding economy and complicated legal system.
The firm's Shanghai license was granted in November, and it already has five people working there with plans to expand to as many as 20 in a few years, a firm official said.
"The rate of change in the legal and regulatory system there is mind-boggling, frankly. Most of it is going on and only getting translated some six to 12 months down the road," said Ken Duck, senior counsel at Foley, who works in the firm's Detroit office.
Having an office in Shanghai will allow the firm to have people on the ground communicating in the Chinese language with government officials on behalf of clients, he added.
Foley, with offices all over the world, opened an office in 2000 in Detroit. The Detroit office has about 40 people in it, and they deal with a wide array of topics.
In the past decade, the firm has been counsel on more than 200 public securities offerings that raised more than $10 billion.
The Detroit office is part of Foley's Midwest region, which includes offices in Chicago and Milwaukee. More than 1,000 attorneys work for Foley.
Foley's clients include JCI and Visteon, and the firm says it has more than $700 million in revenue annually, making it a top law firm in the country.
"Part of the thinking of setting up the Detroit office ... we represent a lot of the automotive industry, particularly in the supplier base," Duck said. "Really around the same time there was a big push for the auto suppliers to head over to China."
Prior to opening the Shanghai office, Foley's Catherine Sun, chair of the firm's Asia practice, already was making inroads in the country on the firm's behalf.
The firm provided international intellectual property counseling to the Chinese government's organizing committee for the 2007 Special Olympics World Summer Games, which were held in Shanghai last October.
While offering a full array of services, the firm plans to specialize in the automotive industry and life sciences.
It also expects to deal with issues surrounding intellectual property matters, a major concern for many U.S. companies operating in China.
"Recent studies indicate that 80% of market capitalization in publicly traded companies is tied to intellectual property assets," Sharon Barner, chair of the firm's intellectual property department, said in a statement. "As a result, businesses are placing more value on their intellectual property assets, making it more important for them to protect and enforce their rights in China."
In Detroit, the Foley office hears from a growing number of Chinese companies looking to do business in Michigan, Duck said.
"There is more discussion and hype than there is real investment at this point. But there are every day more and more companies coming to call ... looking to talk to suppliers and potential customers," Duck said. "With a lot of these investments, not just with China, there is a pretty long lead time in most cases, so you're looking at a couple years down the road before these companies will pull the trigger." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Cooney & Mike Barnhill to Work Sheriff Controversy
Law Firm News |
2008/01/05 10:12
|
Mecklenburg County officials, fearing a lawsuit over the controversy-filled effort to select a new sheriff, have hired a high-powered law firm and one of the state's highest-profile litigators to defend them.
Parks Helms, vice chairman of the county commissioners, said Friday that Charlotte attorney Jim Cooney will be one of the lawyers to defend the county should the sheriff's selection process wind up in court.
The latest legal question was raised Friday, when county commissioner Dan Bishop, a lawyer, sent a letter to county attorney Marvin Bethune questioning the constitutionality of the process the Mecklenburg Democratic Party's executive committee used when it chose Charlotte lawyer Nick Mackey as sheriff.
He cited several federal court cases that held that when a political party exercises a public electoral function such as nominating candidates to fill vacancies, it must follow federal election law.
In the special election last month, precinct representatives had weighted votes based on the precinct's votes for Democratic Gov. Mike Easley in 2004. For example, a precinct that cast 1,000 votes for Easley got 10 votes in the sheriff's contest.
Bishop says that flies in the face of the federal standard for "one man, one vote."
He wants the issue to be added to the Jan. 15 county commissioners meeting agenda.
Bethune said late Friday that, depending on the amount of research required, the entire board might have to authorize him to research the issue, and he wasn't sure if he would have to seek outside help.
The county hired Cooney to work on the sheriff controversy about two weeks ago, said Michelle Lancaster, an associate general manager for the county. Mike Barnhill, a Charlotte lawyer who has previously handled litigation for the county, is also working on the case. Cooney and Barnhill work for Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, a firm with more than 500 lawyers.
Cooney most recently made headlines nationally as the attorney for Reade Seligmann, one of the Duke University lacrosse players charged in a racially charged sexual assault case. The players were exonerated, and prosecutor Mike Nifong has been disbarred.
Barnhill and Cooney are researching laws on the Mecklenburg sheriff's election, and are being paid $360 per hour, Lancaster said. She added that the lawyers give the county a good rate, considering they normally charge "in the $500 (per hour) range."
Helms and Jennifer Roberts, who chairs the commission, said the county has to proceed carefully on the issue. James Ferguson, a prominent Charlotte civil rights lawyer, has suggested he will sue the county if Mackey isn't named sheriff.
Other legal challenges could come as well, Helms added. If a sheriff is improperly selected, inmates could file challenges arguing they were unlawfully held.
Controversy has percolated for weeks surrounding the selection of a replacement for former sheriff Jim Pendergraph, who left Dec. 1 to take a job in Washington, D.C.
Mackey won the Democratic party's Dec. 6 election. But concerns have been raised about the former Charlotte-Mecklenburg police officer. He resigned from the force in 2003 while under internal investigation for allegedly falsifying hours worked.
A majority of commissioners, who would have to confirm Mackey as sheriff, have said they want to wait until the state Democrats rule on two grievances challenging Mackey's election.
Republican commissioners this week raised the possibility that the commission can legally bypass Mackey.
Bethune, the county attorney, originally told commissioners state law required the Democratic Party to pick Pendergraph's replacement.
But now Bethune and the Womble Carlyle lawyers are pointing to a second state law -- one that appears to give commissioners, not the Party, power to pick the new sheriff.
Commissioners report that their lawyers have said a 2005 N.C. Court of Appeals ruling gives precedence to the law that says the commissioners pick the sheriff. The ruling cites one of the laws in saying that if a sheriff wishes to resign, the commissioners appoint a new sheriff. In the next sentence, the ruling cites the other law and adds: "if a vacancy occurs for any other reason, it remains the responsibility of the county commissioners to select a new sheriff."
But other N.C. election law experts disagree. They note that the 2005 ruling came in a civil rights case filed by a Robeson County jail inmate, not an elections law case. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet. |
Law Firm Directory
|
|
Legal News RSS Feed
