Today's Date: Add To Favorites
Casinos and IRS wrangle over big tippers
Tax | 2007/03/29 18:14

As Las Vegas becomes a magnet for ever-wealthier visitors, a drooling Uncle Sam wants a bigger piece of the action. The Internal Revenue Service believes that more than $9 billion in tips go unreported nationwide, and that Las Vegas casino workers - perhaps the largest concentration of big-tip earners in the country - are partly to blame. And now it thinks that they're earning more tips than ever, and it's ready to collect.

It is negotiating with casinos to adjust upward the amount of tip income the casinos expect their workers to make.

The word is spreading among the thousands of cocktail waitresses, food servers, bartenders, busboys and bellhops who make most of their money from tips. The rank-and-file workers complain that they were not consulted on the new tip formulas.

If there really is more money in town, said Arturo Valadez, a sommelier at Mandalay Bay, it's not necessarily reaching workers' pockets.

"I'm not against paying (more) taxes, but the way they are doing it isn't necessarily the most accurate or effective," he said.

The issue is coming to a head as the IRS and Las Vegas casinos negotiate a new agreement on how much tip income workers should declare to avoid being audited by the government.

Since the early 1990s Las Vegas casinos and the IRS have agreed on how much tip income the employees should declare.

Since then, the IRS has struck similar agreements with other industries nationwide, including restaurants, hair salons and barbers. In total, tip agreements with employers have yielded billions of dollars in additional taxes for the government. Included in the voluntary participation are more than 47,000 establishments nationwide. That the agreements were born in the cash-rich casino industry is apparent in the IRS tip-reporting guide for taxpayers, which specifically mentions casino workers and features an illustration of a royal flush on its cover page.

The agreements, much like hard-won union contracts, are complex, site-specific and subject to change. Each tipped position at each participating Las Vegas casino has its own tip estimate because casinos individually negotiate rates, which differ by shift and job.

A food server in a coffee shop during the day shift, for instance, might be expected to declare $13,000 in tip income, whereas a swing-shift server in a full-service restaurant could be required to declare more than $20,000 in tip income. Employers withhold taxes on the estimated tips.

The agreements ease the paperwork burden for workers and the IRS. Workers don't have to track their tips, and the IRS doesn't spend time auditing workers.

And workers know a good deal when they see it: Many earn more in tips than the amount estimated by the IRS.

That's probably why, according to the IRS, 80 percent of Nevada's more than 100,000 tip-earning hotel workers participate in the agreement program, which is voluntary for employers and workers.

More than four years ago the casino industry fought to keep down proposed tip rates that lobbyists said would have doubled, tripled and even quadrupled workers' claimed tips. Both sides wrangled over rates in the years leading up to the three-year tip agreement reached in 2003. Hoping to capture even more unreported tips, the IRS expanded the template of the Nevada agreement to casinos nationwide.

The local tip agreements expired Dec. 31, although the old rates apply until a new agreement is reached in coming weeks.

Even though tip rates probably will go up for many Las Vegas casino workers, the alternative to participating in the tip agreement isn't all that appealing.

The IRS requires tipped workers who don't participate in the agreements to track daily tips and report the aggregate on their tax returns - and risk being audited. The IRS offers a worksheet with spaces for tips earned each day, a separate column for tips shared with others and spaces for co-workers' names.

After spending eight hours on their feet at work, most are unlikely to spend their free time logging tips on a spreadsheet.

That's why the IRS negotiated rates that might be less than actual tips yet guarantee a stream of tip taxes - up to $900 million annually in Nevada - that might otherwise go uncollected.

The American Gaming Association, which helped casinos negotiate the 2003 agreement, is involved in the latest round of discussions with the IRS.

A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., who has assisted the industry in the negotiation process, said the IRS has agreed to phase in tip-rate increases over the three years of the new agreement rather than hit workers with a bigger tax bill all at once. The phased-in increase would extend beyond Nevada to include New Jersey, the Gulf Coast and other U.S. casino markets.

The second step of the process - determining the tip rates for each casino - has been more time consuming and contentious, with the IRS "pushing for substantial increases for certain positions," Reid spokesman Jon Summers said.

IRS, American Gaming Association and Culinary Union representatives are meeting this week to iron out a compromise.

The Culinary, which began union contract negotiations with Strip casinos two weeks ago, isn't taking any chances. The union, which represents 55,000 tip-earning workers, is proposing that employers contribute to a "defense fund" to assist employees who choose not to participate in the upcoming agreement and therefore might become subject to IRS audits.

"A coffee shop waitress on graveyard can be audited after she decides not to participate because she thinks rates are too high. We don't think that's fair," Culinary Union Secretary-Treasurer D. Taylor said. "A casino executive who gets called in for an audit and is questioned has legal representation. An individual worker should not have to take on the IRS by himself."

For now, the casinos appear to have the upper hand in this high-stakes game. The industry has threatened to chuck the program entirely - a potential tax loss in the billions for the IRS - unless the agency can agree to a smaller increase in tip rates.

"The rates (the IRS is) talking about are quite scary to folks," Taylor said.

Distributed by Scripps-McClatchy Western Service, www.scrippsnews.com.



Jenkins law firm to close amid tax probe
Tax | 2007/03/29 15:58

Dallas law firm Jenkens & Gilchrist will close and pay a $76 million fine to settle a federal criminal tax-shelter probe, government officials said Thursday. 
 
The penalty stems from the firm's "promotion of abusive and fraudulent tax shelters in violation of the tax law," the Internal Revenue Service said.

Jenkens & Gilchrist, which had more than 600 attorneys until recently, intends to close its main office in Dallas at the end of the month, after having already closing other offices, the U.S. Attorney's office said.

The firm was shutting down because it realized its illegal activities had "caused serious damage to its reputation, revenues and stability," the U.S. Attorney's office said.

The law firm did not have an immediate comment, but in an earlier statement said, "We deeply regret our involvement in this tax practice, and the serious harm it caused to the United States Treasury."

The IRS said some 1,400 high-net-worth investors followed Jenkens & Gilchrist's advice "and will owe interest and penalties on their underpayment of tax."



Godfrey & Kahn Offers Diversity Scholars Program
Law Firm News | 2007/03/29 14:31



The law firm of Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. is pleased to announce that it has established the Diversity Scholars Program as part of the firm’s ongoing diversity initiatives. The program offers a $2,500 scholarship to first-year minority law students at the University of Michigan, the University of Iowa, and Northwestern University for use as a partial tuition payment during the student’s first year of law school. Godfrey & Kahn also offers full-tuition fellowships at the University of Wisconsin and Marquette University law schools. The 2007 Diversity Scholars Program award winners include:


Jacqueline Nicole James (Northwestern University). She is also in the process of earning a master’s degree in Business Administration through the Kellogg School of Management.

Jacqueline earned her bachelor’s degree in Engineering and Management Systems from Columbia University, where she was on the Dean’s List and was a Citigroup Scholar. She is currently a participant in Management Leadership for Tomorrow MBA Prep Program 2006.

Robyn Nicole Lewis(University of Michigan). She received her master’s degree in Sociology and her bachelor’s degree in Human Biology from Stanford University, where she received the Black Community Services Deans Award for Academic Excellence. Robyn was awarded the NCAA women’s volleyball full scholarship and was the Stanford Athletic Board Award winner for outstanding female senior.

Rupal Vijay Vora (University of Iowa). She is a first-year representative for the Organization of Women Law Students and Staff. Rupal received her bachelor’s degree with dual honors in Political Science and Gender Studies from Northwestern University and was on the Dean’s List.

"We are delighted to award these well-deserved scholarships as part of our firm’s ongoing efforts to promote diversity in our profession," said Mark Witt, a shareholder and member of the firm’s Corporate Practice Group, as well as co-chair of the firm’s recruiting committee and a member of the scholarship selection committee. "We hope that the scholarships provide these talented individuals with recognition for their achievements and some financial assistance for their future endeavors."

Founded in 1957, Godfrey & Kahn maintains offices in Milwaukee, Madison, Appleton, Green Bay, and Waukesha, WI; Washington, DC; and Shanghai, PRC. With more than 190 attorneys, Godfrey & Kahn provides legal and business advice to clients ranging from small businesses and governmental entities to large privately and publicly held national and international companies.

http://www.gklaw.com



AT&T, Verizon win government telecom contract
Business | 2007/03/29 13:57

The U.S. General Services Administration cast Sprint Nextel Corp. <S.N> aside and picked AT&T Inc. <T.N>, Qwest Communications International Inc. <Q.N> and Verizon Communications <VZ.N> on Thursday for the largest-ever federal telecommunications contract.

Government agencies are expected to spend at least $20 billion on the contract over 10 years, the GSA estimates -- a move that will overhaul the government's telecommunications services.

Under terms of the GSA contract, called Networx Universal, agency spending could be increased to as much as $48 billion.

The announcement comes after weeks of anticipation and years of preparation. The four companies have spent millions of dollars preparing bids and called on thousands of their employees to develop proposals and hammer out the details.

The failure to include Sprint is seen as a huge upset as it has provided telecommunication services to U.S. government agencies for 18 years.

"Sprint is disappointed not to receive a portion of the Networx Universal contract," it said in a statement. "The Sprint team spent significant time and energy on the program and has made large investments to meet the diverse requirements of the agencies."

The company said it will request a meeting with GSA next week and will decide whether to "protest or not" after that.

JOCKEYING FOR CONTRACTS MOVES TO SECOND STAGE

Even though Sprint is out of the picture, the three winning companies will still have to compete for individual contracts within the government agencies.

The companies agreement with the GSA would allow them to sell phone and Internet services to as many as 135 federal agencies, such as the treasury and defense departments.

"It's a big win for Qwest," said the company's senior vice president Diana Gowen, while AT&T senior vice president Don Herring said his company could not be happier that it won.

Both said it was too early to say how the contract would impact overall revenue and earnings except to acknowledge that Networx Universal is a very large contract.

"We will get our fair share of the 20 billion, or 40 billion, it's all about your creativity," Gowen said.

It is not mandatory for the agencies to use a company the GSA has chosen, but there are benefits to be had, such as a common billing platform.

The Networx Universal contract is one of two that comprise the Networx program. Companies bidding on Networx Universal had to demonstrate that they could provide 36 mandatory services, such as private phone lines and secure e-mail.

The second, called Networx Enterprise, is expected to be awarded in May 2007 and required companies to show they could provide nine mandatory services. Projected spending on Enterprise is estimated at $20.1 billion.

The complete Networx contract is the third in a series of telecommunications procurement programs developed by GSA that are designed to leverage the buying power of the federal government and save U.S. taxpayers money.



Microsoft unveils Deepfish mobile browser
Venture Business News | 2007/03/29 13:53

Microsoft Corp. has unveiled a web browser for cellphones and other devices with limited screen space that zooms into a page to make it easier to read and navigate. The prototype browser, dubbed Deepfish, displays an image of the page as a point of reference. Users can highlight a section of the page, which they can then zoom in and out of to quickly view it in detail, rather than scrolling through multiple screens to see the parts that interest them.

Microsoft says its prototype Deepfish mobile web browser makes it easier to display and read web pages on devices with small screens.
(Microsoft Corp.) Microsoft unveiled the browser Wednesday at O'Reilly Media Inc.'s showcase for emerging technologies, the ETech conference in San Diego, Calif.

"Think about your mobile browsing experience today," Gary William Flake, director of Microsoft Live Labs, said in a written statement. "It's often less than intuitive, the pages don't look like what you've come to expect on the desktop and it takes a long time for a page to load. Deepfish aims to solve that problem."

Deepfish maintains the page layout, rather than reformatting it to fit a small screen, which can sometimes interfere with the context that information on those pages may require for proper understanding or ease of use. For example, menus and other navigation elements are sometimes rendered unusable when a web page is reformatted to fit a smaller screen.



K&L Gates' IP Practice Continues Growth
Law Firm News | 2007/03/29 12:15



Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP (K&L Gates) welcomes W. David Shenk to its intellectual property and patent litigation practice. Shenk comes to the firm from Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness.

Shenk has litigated patent and copyright cases involving database software, document management systems, digital devices, semiconductors, computer systems for integrating video with transactional information, inhalable antibiotics, architectural plans, and exercise equipment and sporting goods, including in-line skates, snowboard bindings, treadmills, and elliptical exercisers. His experience includes representations in state and federal court and before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, and the Supreme Court of the United States. Shenk's practice also encompasses all aspects of trademark law, including client counseling, trademark clearance and prosecution, administrative proceedings, and litigation.

K&L Gates Seattle Administrative Partner Robert Mitchell said: "David's skills and experience with a diverse range of technologies help us advance K&L Gates' counsel to the world's leading companies. We are pleased to welcome him to the firm."

Kari Glover, K&L Gates' Global Integration Partner, said: "The addition of David to our firm follows many other recent high-profile additions to the firm's IP practice and demonstrates K&L Gates' commitment to providing top-tier IP counsel to clients as it continues to grow internationally."

K&L Gates comprises approximately 1,400 lawyers in 22 offices located in North America, Europe and Asia, and represents capital markets participants, entrepreneurs, growth and middle market companies, leading FORTUNE 100 and FTSE 100 global corporations and public sector entities. For more information, visit www.klgates.com.



Data Theft Believed to Be Biggest Hack
Business | 2007/03/29 12:10

A hacker or hackers stole data from at least 45.7 million credit and debit cards of shoppers at off-price retailers including T.J. Maxx and Marshalls in a case believed to be the largest such breach of consumer information.

For the first time since disclosing the theft more than two months ago, the parent company of nearly 2,500 discount stores put a number on how much card data was compromised _ and it's a number TJX Cos. acknowledges could go still higher.

Experts say TJX's disclosures in a regulatory filing late Wednesday revealed security holes that persist at many firms entrusted with consumer data: failure to promptly delete data on customer transactions, and to guard secrets about how such data is protected through encryption.

"It's not clear when information was deleted, it's not clear who had access to what, and it's not clear whether the data kept in all these files was encrypted, so it's very hard to know how big this was," said Deepak Taneja, chief executive of Aveksa, a Waltham, Mass.-based firm that advises companies on information security.

The case has led banks to reissue cards to customers as a precaution against further fraud beyond cases detected as far away as Sweden and Hong Kong, according to the Massachussets Bankers Association, which is tracking fraud reports linked to Framingham, Mass.-based TJX, parent company of stores across North America and the United Kingdom.

The only arrests believed tied to the case involve a gift card scam in which 10 people are suspected of buying data from the TJX hackers to purchase Wal-Mart gift cards in northern Florida. The group _ who aren't believed to have committed the TJX hack _ then used the cards to buy $1 million worth of electronics and jewelry at Wal-Mart's Sam's Club stores, according to Gainesville, Fla., police.

Information from 45.7 million cards was stolen from transactions beginning in January 2003 and ending Nov. 23 of that year, TJX said in the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission after business hours Wednesday. TJX did not estimate the number of cards from which information was stolen for transactions occurring from Nov. 24, 2003, to June 28, 2004.

TJX said about three-quarters of the 45.7 million cards had either expired at the time of the theft, or the stolen information didn't include security code data from the cards' magnetic stripes. Starting in September 2003, TJX began masking the codes by storing them in computers as asterisks rather than numbers, the company said.

The filing also said another 455,000 customers who returned merchandise without receipts had their data stolen, including driver's license numbers.

With at least 46 million consumer records accessed, the TJX case outranks the previous largest case tracked by the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse: a June 2005 disclosure by credit card processor CardSystems that hackers accessed accounts of 40 million card holders.



[PREV] [1] ..[1046][1047][1048][1049][1050][1051][1052][1053][1054].. [1177] [NEXT]
All
Class Action
Bankruptcy
Biotech
Breaking Legal News
Business
Corporate Governance
Court Watch
Criminal Law
Health Care
Human Rights
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Law Center
Law Promo News
Legal Business
Legal Marketing
Litigation
Medical Malpractice
Mergers & Acquisitions
Political and Legal
Politics
Practice Focuses
Securities
Elite Lawyers
Tax
Featured Law Firms
Tort Reform
Venture Business News
World Business News
Law Firm News
Attorneys in the News
Events and Seminars
Environmental
Legal Careers News
Patent Law
Consumer Rights
International
Legal Spotlight
Current Cases
State Class Actions
Federal Class Actions
Starbucks appears likely to ..
Supreme Court will weigh ban..
Judge in Trump case orders m..
Court makes it easier to sue..
Top Europe rights court cond..
Elon Musk will be investigat..
Retired Supreme Court Justic..
The Man Charged in an Illino..
Texas’ migrant arrest law w..
Former Georgia insurance com..
Alabama woman who faked kidn..
A Supreme Court ruling in a ..
Court upholds mandatory pris..
Trump wants N.Y. hush money ..
Supreme Court restores Trump..


Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet.
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Lorain Elyria Divorce Lawyer
www.loraindivorceattorney.com
Legal Document Services in Los Angeles, CA
Best Legal Document Preparation
www.tllsg.com
Car Accident Lawyers
Sunnyvale, CA Personal Injury Attorney
www.esrajunglaw.com
East Greenwich Family Law Attorney
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Connecticut Special Education Lawyer
www.fortelawgroup.com
  Law Firm Directory
 
 
 
© ClassActionTimes.com. All rights reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Class Action Times as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Affordable Law Firm Web Design