|
|
|
Ex-city cab Guilty Plea In New York Terror Case
Court Watch |
2007/04/03 13:45
|
A Baltimore man who attended an Islamist guerrilla training camp in Pakistan pleaded guilty in New York to a terrorism charge. Mahmud Faruq Brent, 32, faces up to 15 years in jail at his July 10 sentencing, The Washington Post reported. Brent, who is also known as Mahmud Al Mutazzim, was scheduled to go on trial April 24 with two other defendants. His lawyer, Hassen Ibn Abdellah, told the Post Brent didn't plan to testify against the other defendants. Brent pleaded guilty Monday in U.S. District Court in Manhattan to conspiring to aid a group on the U.S. terrorism list, the Lashkar-e-Taiba, by attending one of its training camps. He was arrested in 2005 and has admitted attending the camp in 2002, the Post reported. Federal officials tied Brink, an Ohio native and former Washington taxi and ambulance driver, to Seifullah Chapman, a member of what prosecutors called the "Virginia jihad network," the Post said. Chapman was sentenced to 65 years in prison on charges that included conspiring to support Lashkar-e-Taiba. |
|
|
|
|
|
California High Court Considers Marriage Challenge
Court Watch |
2007/04/03 00:04
|
The Supreme Court of California began receiving briefs Monday in a case that challenges a state law that defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Gay activists charge it "segregates them and their families from the rest of society," the Contra Costa Times reported. "This separation sends a powerful message," read a brief filed by the city of San Francisco, "one that reinforces in the public mind the already entrenched inferior status of lesbians and gay men. The message is easily understood: the state will recognize, but it will not honor, lesbian and gay family relationships." Former Assemblyman Larry Bowler, a family advocate, said the court should defer to voters. "At least four justices on that San Francisco bench are against the broad majority of California voters, who want marriage preserved and protected," he said. "The high court could deal a low blow to the voters by creating so-called 'same-sex marriages' in late 2007 or early 2008."
Liberty Counsel filed a brief representing Campaign for California Families. It challenged the assertion that protecting marriage is discriminatory. "They aren't arguing for a minor change in marriage, but for a deconstruction of the entire institution of marriage," read a news release from the non-profit legal group. "The essence of marriage has always been the union of one man and one woman. We have never allowed any other human relationships to be united under the banner of marriage." |
|
|
|
|
|
Justices reject Guantánamo detainees' appeal
Court Watch |
2007/04/02 09:40
|
The Supreme Court rejected an appeal Monday from Guantánamo detainees who want to challenge their five-year-long confinement in court, a victory for the Bush administration's legal strategy in its fight against terrorism. The victory may be only temporary, however. The high court twice previously has extended legal protections to prisoners at the U.S. naval base in Cuba. These individuals were seized as potential terrorists following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and only 10 have been charged with a crime. Despite the earlier rulings, none of the roughly 385 detainees has yet had a hearing in a civilian court challenging his detention because the administration has moved aggressively to limit the legal rights of prisoners it has labeled as enemy combatants. A federal appeals court in Washington in February upheld a key provision of a law enacted last year that strips federal courts of their ability to hear such challenges. At issue is whether prisoners held at Guantánamo have a right to habeas corpus review, a basic tenet of the Constitution that protects people from unlawful imprisonment. |
|
|
|
|
|
Court Revokes Citizenship of Former Nazi Policeman
Court Watch |
2007/03/31 10:45
|
A federal judge in Detroit has revoked the U.S. citizenship of John (Ivan) Kalymon of Troy, Mich., because he shot Jews in 1942 while serving in a Nazi-sponsored police unit that helped liquidate a Nazi-created Jewish ghetto in German-occupied Poland, Assistant Attorney General Alice S. Fisher for the Criminal Division announced today. U.S. District Judge Marianne O. Battani found that Kalymon served in the 5th Commissariat (later designated the 7th) of the Nazi-operated Ukrainian Auxiliary Police (UAP) during World War II, in the city of L’viv. (That city, now in western Ukraine, was part of Poland until 1939.) The judge concluded that the 5th/7th Commissariat, along with other armed L’viv UAP units and other forces, rounded up Jews, shot Jews, prevented Jews from escaping, and transferred Jews to forced labor camps or killing sites for mass execution. Judge Battani further found, largely on the basis of captured wartime reports, that Kalymon shot Jews during these roundups. More than 100,000 Jews in L’viv were killed or displaced between 1942 and 1943 in part as a result of actions by the UAP in which Kalymon participated, according to Judge Battani. Assistant Attorney General Fisher said, “The court’s ruling confirms that individuals who participated in genocide will not be permitted to retain the privilege of American citizenship.” Kalymon entered the United States from Germany in 1949 and became a U.S. citizen in 1955. Judge Battani found that he was not eligible for citizenship because his service to Nazi Germany made him ineligible to immigrate to the U.S. She specifically found that he was ineligible to immigrate because Kalymon “assisted in the persecution of civil populations,” “advocated or acquiesced in activities or conduct contrary to civilization and human decency,” and lied about his UAP service when he applied for a visa to the U.S. “Irrefutable evidence, including a handwritten report prepared by Kalymon in which he accounted to his superiors for ammunition he expended in shooting Jews, proved his participation in Nazi genocide. It has taken 62 long years, but history has at last caught up with John Kalymon,” said Office of Special Investigations (OSI) Director Eli M. Rosenbaum. OSI investigated the case and prosecuted it, in partnership with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan. The case was tried in Detroit last fall by OSI senior trial attorneys Jeffrey L. Menkin, William H. Kenety V, and Todd Schneider. The proceedings to denaturalize Kalymon were instituted in 2004 by OSI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Michigan. |
|
|
|
|
|
Court takes strike option from Northwest attendants
Court Watch |
2007/03/30 20:02
|
Northwest Airlines Corp. flight attendants can't strike over pay cuts at the bankrupt carrier, a U.S. appeals court said, upholding a federal judge's ruling. "Although this is a complicated case, one feature is simple enough to describe: Northwest's flight attendants have proven intransigent in the face of Northwest's manifest need to reorganize," a three-judge panel of the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals said Thursday. The ruling gives Northwest the advantage in stalled talks with attendants, who hoped to gain leverage with the chance to strike the airline. They're balking at $195 million in annual pay and benefit cuts imposed as the carrier works toward a second-quarter bankruptcy exit. Northwest enacted the cuts July 31 after the union for its 9,300 attendants rejected two contracts negotiated by their leaders. The savings are part of the Eagan, Minn.-based airline's $1.4 billion in annual reductions in labor spending. Northwest said in a statement that it was pleased with the ruling and that it hoped to reach a consensual agreement with the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA. The union was "very surprised" by the decision, spokesman Ricky Thornton said, and the group is considering whether to appeal. The union wants the National Mediation Board that governs airline labor disputes to "release" it from talks with Northwest, triggering a 30-day countdown to a possible strike. The sides last met face to face Feb. 2, and no new talks are scheduled. The attendants are urging federal lawmakers to press the mediation board to grant the release. Unlike Northwest's other unions, the attendants don't have a claim in the airline's bankruptcy. The group would have had a $182 million claim had it ratified a contract in 2006. Thornton said there is a risk the attendants will get nothing if they don't reach an agreement before Northwest exits bankruptcy. In its ruling, the appeals court said the U.S. Railway Labor Act "forbids an immediate strike when a bankruptcy court approves a debtor carrier's rejection of a collective-bargaining agreement" that is subject to the act and allows imposition of new terms. "For airline unions, this is a big setback," said John Gallagher, a lawyer for the Air Transport Association, the Washington-based trade group for major U.S. airlines. Northwest filed for bankruptcy Sept. 14, 2005, the same day as larger rival Delta Air Lines Inc. Delta expects to exit bankruptcy by April 30. |
|
|
|
|
|
California police officer Sues to Compete in Pageant
Court Watch |
2007/03/30 02:53
|
The city of Chula Vista has issued a response to a lawsuit filed by a police officer who wants to compete in beauty pageants. Deana Mory is currently representing California in the Ms. United States beauty pageant. But she is also a police officer who patrols the streets of Chula Vista. She told NBC police administrators said if she competes she could be reprimanded or fired because prize money and gifts from the pageants violate city police. Mory said she would refuse the money if she won the national title, but the city did not accept her compromise. As a result, Mory and the Police Officers Association filed a lawsuit against The Chula Vista Police Department. Wednesday night, Liz Pursell from the city of Chula Vista released a statement saying, "There is no merit to the allegations. Ms. Mory did participate in the pageant. The city is in the process of responding to the second lawsuit. We anticipate filing a motion seeking a judgment in favor of the city." The beauty pageant is in July, and Mory said she plans on taking part. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mental health center to repay $556687
Court Watch |
2007/03/29 05:06
|
A nonprofit provider of mental health services paid nearly $557,000 to settle allegations of improper billing to government health programs, the state attorney general's office said yesterday. Tri-City Mental Health Center began reviewing employee complaints about irregularities in its government claims practices in 2003, and the nonprofit's board ordered an outside audit, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley said. Tri-City reported the improper billing to the government in late 2004, and was never charged. State and federal investigators found Tri-City Mental Health billed the state Medicaid program and the state Department of Mental Health for psychiatric services that were never provided or couldn't be documented. The improper billing occurred for more than two years, starting in Sept. 2001 at a center in Malden. At least one manager at the Malden office was fired as a result of Tri-City's internal investigation, Coakley said. Ellen Dalton, a manager at Tri-City, said the improperly received government payments were used to fund the nonprofit's operations, not for any personal use by its nearly 500 employees. Dalton said Tri-City set aside cash from recent years' operations, and has paid the $556,687 settlement total in full. "The agency is ready to move forward, and no services will be disrupted," she said. The nonprofit, which began operations in the 1960s, runs mental health centers in the neighboring communities of Malden, Medford, and Everett. The settlement total equals the amount of money that investigators found had been improperly billed, plus interest, according to Dalton. Under the settlement, Tri-City agreed to ensure future compliance with rules governing Medicare reimbursement. The settlement relieves Tri-City and its board of any civil or administrative liability. Coakley said Tri-City "has cooperated fully with the investigation." |
|
|
|
|
Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet. |
Law Firm Directory
|
|