|
|
|
Former IBM Employee Sues for Damages
Breaking Legal News |
2007/02/19 12:49
|
WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. — A man who was fired by IBM for visiting an adult chat room at work is suing the company for $5 million, claiming he is an Internet addict who deserves treatment and sympathy rather than dismissal. James Pacenza, 58, of Montgomery, N.Y., says he visits chat rooms to treat traumatic stress incurred in 1969 when he saw his best friend killed during an Army patrol in Vietnam. In papers filed in federal court in White Plains, Pacenza said the stress caused him to become "a sex addict, and with the development of the Internet, an Internet addict." He claimed protection under the Americans with Disabilities Act. His lawyer, Michael Diederich, says Pacenza never visited pornographic sites at work, violated no written IBM rule and did not surf the Internet any more or any differently than other employees. He also says age discrimination contributed to IBM's actions. Pacenza, 55 at the time, had been with the company for 19 years. International Business Machines Corp. has asked Judge Stephen Robinson for a summary judgment, saying its policy against surfing sexual Web sites is clear. It also claims Pacenza was told he could lose his job after an incident four months earlier; Pacenza denies that. "Plaintiff was discharged by IBM because he visited an Internet chat room for a sexual experience during work after he had been previously warned," the company said. IBM also said sexual-behavior disorders are specifically excluded from the ADA and denied any age discrimination. If it goes to trial, the case could affect how employers regulate Internet use that is not work-related, or how Internet overuse is categorized medically. Stanford University issued a nationwide study last year that found that up to 14 percent of computer users reported neglecting work, school, families, food and sleep to use the Internet. Pacenza was making $65,000 a year operating a machine at a plant in East Fishkill, N.Y., that makes computer chips. Several times during the day, machine operators are idle for five to 10 minutes as the tool measures the thickness of silicon wafers. It was during such down time on May 28, 2003, that Pacenza logged onto a chat room from his workstation. Diederich says Pacenza had returned that day from visiting the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington and logged onto a site called ChatAvenue and then to an adult chat room. Pacenza, who has a wife and two children, said using the Internet at work was encouraged by IBM and served as "a form of self-medication" for post-traumatic stress disorder. He said he tried to stay away from chat rooms at work, but that day, "I felt I needed the interactive engagement of chat talk to divert my attention from my thoughts of Vietnam and death." |
|
|
|
|
|
Lottery Winners Being Sued for Partying
Breaking Legal News |
2007/02/19 12:43
|
PORTLAND, Ore. - A couple who won a $2.6 million lottery jackpot and spoke of helping young people fight drug addiction and alcohol abuse are facing a lawsuit alleging they held four months of parties with public sex, fights and signs of drug dealing. Samuel Howard, 54, denied the allegations. The lawsuit was filed under a little-used chronic nuisance law aimed at ridding neighborhoods of crime-infested properties. The city wants to board the house up for six to 12 months, according to Roland Iparraguirre, a deputy city attorney. In the first four months after they moved in, police were called to the street 52 times, the lawsuit said. It said children are often used as lookouts and there are frequent, brief visits and multiple locks on the door, all indications of drug dealing. Howard said the house is on the market. Iparraguirre said the litigation would be dropped if the house is sold and the alleged criminal activity stops. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York lawyer admits stealing $20 million
Breaking Legal News |
2007/02/17 09:36
|
A lawyer pleaded guilty to stealing more than $20 million from a bank and at least one client, spending the loot on vacation homes, a wedding and generous salaries for his employees, authorities said. Under a deal with prosecutors, Anthony Bellettieri, 53, faces more than a decade in prison after admitting Thursday in federal court to bank and mail fraud dating to at least 2003. AdvertisementBellettieri, a real estate lawyer, stole the funds through check kiting – taking money from his law firm's escrow account and writing checks on another account to cover the escrow account's losses.
According to J.P. Morgan Chase, the primary victim, the tactic worked partly because he used checks with a printed error. The scheme fell apart after the bank issued correct checks in November. Authorities said Bellettieri also convinced a client to invest almost $2 million in phony private mortgages. Defense lawyer Murray Richman told The Journal News, “It's a terrible thing to see a man destroyed and humbled by his own actions and lose control of his life.” Prosecutor Cynthia Keefe Dunne said the stolen money paid for, among other things, a swimming pool at Bellettieri's Pleasantville home, a family wedding, high salaries for the law firm's workers and condos in Miami Beach and Aruba. Bellettieri was released on $500,000 bond. Sentencing is May 18. His plea agreement requires him to pay as much as $22 million in restitution and forfeit properties he purchased.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virgin Islands Man Indicted on Child Porn Charges
Breaking Legal News |
2007/02/16 14:03
|
WASHINGTON – A federal grand jury in the District of the Virgin Islands returned an indictment charging a St. Thomas man with five counts of child pornography, Assistant Attorney General Alice S. Fisher of the Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney Anthony J. Jenkins for the District of the Virgin Islands announced today. Bradley Douglas Highbarger is charged with two counts of receiving child pornography, two counts of possessing child pornography, and one count of attempting to distribute child pornography. If convicted on all of the charges, the defendant faces a mandatory minimum sentence of five years and a maximum sentence of 20 years with a $250,000 fine and the possibility of lifetime supervised release. On July 20, 2006, investigators initially executed two search warrants on Highbarger’s residence and computer to investigate suspected crimes involving passport fraud and controlled substances. During the review of the computer evidence, investigators also uncovered still pictures and video depicting child pornography. In or about July 2006, the defendant used peer-to-peer file sharing software to download and then possess child pornography. The defendant also configured the software to allow further distribution of the child pornography to any and all users of the peer-to-peer software program around the world. The defendant was arrested and detained on the drug and passport fraud offenses on July 20, 2006, and has since been detained in federal custody. The case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney Kayla Bakshi of the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney St. Clair Theodore of the U.S. Attorney’s office for the District of the Virgin Islands. This case is being investigated by multiple law enforcement agencies including the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency, Diplomatic Security Service of the U.S. Department of State, and the Postal Inspection Service. The charges contained in this indictment are allegations only and the defendant is presumed innocent until convicted at trial. This case is being brought as part of Project Safe Childhood. In February 2006, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales created Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative designed to protect children from online exploitation and abuse. Led by the U.S. Attorneys Offices, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the Internet, as well as identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.projectsafechildhood.gov/. |
|
|
|
|
|
Former Google Exec Founds Xooxle for Law Firms
Breaking Legal News |
2007/02/09 09:43
|
Washington, DC -- XooxleAnswers (pronounced 'zooks-il-answers') is a new research service with a strong capability for providing backup legal research for lawyers and firms whose own staffs are stretched thin, and for clients looking to cut back on the cost of legal work.
XooxleAnswers was started by former Google Answers researcher David Sarokin, an expert at internet-based research with a strong technical and legal background. "Before Google Answers was recently retired, we fielded hundreds of questions on all major aspects of legal work," said Sarokin. "With the start-up of XooxleAnswers, we look forward to continuing that tradition of providing expert quality research, at very affordable prices."
XooxleAnswers covers a broad range of legal topics, including:
- patents and prior art
- business background, competitive intelligence, and due diligence
- missing persons, criminal records, personal background checks
- trademark, copyright (traditional and digital), and other intellectual property research
- slander, libel, defamation cases
- constitutional law
- landlord-tenant disputes
- criminal law
- environmental regulation
- malpractice case law
- international law
With access to specialty legal databases such as Lexis-Nexis, PACER, Martindale, LII, and state and county electronic case filings (ECF) -- as well as hundreds of other data sources such as Factiva, Dialog, EBSCO, Dun and Bradstreet -- XooxleAnswers can quickly and expertly conduct research relevant to your specific needs.
"We also have an amazing capacity to track down obscure pieces of information," said Sarokin, "things like a hard-to-find newspaper article, confirming an old address, finding documented examples of 'prior art' technologies. When others can't find it, XooxleAnswers often can."
"The best way to see what we can do for your firm is to give us a try," said Sarokin. "There's no risk. Our work at XooxleAnswers is fully guaranteed. If our research does not meet your needs for any reason, we will continue working on it until it does, or refund your payment...whichever you prefer."
Visit the XooxleAnswers website to inquire about our services, and to see examples of some of our legal research work.
XooxleAnswers |
|
|
|
|
|
Bizarre Legal Twist in Anna Nicole Custody Case
Breaking Legal News |
2007/02/09 09:00
|
A bizarre twist in the bizarre life of Anna Nicole Smith was revealed today with a lawyer for the former Playmate's boyfriend seeking to have her body DNA tested before the family can claim it. Smith died suddenly on Thursday, aged 39.
Debra Opri represents photographer Larry Birkenhead, who claims paternity of Anna Nicole's four-month old baby Dannielynn.
Opri told Fox News: "Now it's time to put up or shut up," Opri said. "This is despicable what's been happening, and it's got to end. Anna Nicole Smith is dead at the age of 39 because of a lifestyle. I do not want that child anywhere near [Smith's partner] Howard K. Stern, and that's all I'm going to say about it."
It is anticipated that a paternity hearing set down for Friday would proceed. The battle, one of several for Anna Nicole Smith, who has been named in a class action weight loss lawsuit also, started after the baby was born in September. |
|
|
|
|
|
Anna Nicole Legal Battle: What will happen?
Breaking Legal News |
2007/02/09 08:54
|
Continually in the tabloids, actress and model Anna Nicole Smith continues to make headlines after her death, as her legal disputes remain undecided and U.S. authorities probe the cause of her sudden death. Authorities said she was rushed to hospital on Thursday afternoon after a private nurse found her unconscious and unresponsive at the Seminole Hard Rock Cafe Hotel and Casino in Hollywood, Fla. Smith, the 39-year-old former Playboy model, died Thursday. Deputy Police Chief Michael Browne said Friday that officials have interviewed everyone connected to the death and no one was under suspicion."Nothing about this death seems suspicious. We're not treating it that way," Browne said. "We're being very thorough. We're going to look at everything." The medical examiner's office also said it began conducting an autopsy on Friday morning. Dr. Joshua Perper, who was scheduled to perform the autopsy, had said Thursday that if Smith died of natural causes, the findings would likely be released quickly. However, definitive results could take weeks, he added. Legal IssuesSmith had been embroiled in several legal disputes prior to her death, including a paternity suit over her five-month-old daughter. Attorney Howard K. Stern, Smith's most recent partner, is listed as the baby's father on the birth certificate. However, her former boyfriend Larry Birkhead has claimed to be the infant's biological father. An emergency court hearing into the paternity suit was scheduled for Friday in Los Angeles. Just last week, Smith had been included in a class-action lawsuit against TrimSpa, which produces a weight-loss pill for which she served as spokesperson. The suit alleges the marketing of the weight-loss supplement was false and misleading. Most prominently, however, Smith — a former Playboy covergirl, playmate of the year and Guess model — was involved in a decade-long battle over the fortune of her former husband, J. Howard Marshall. The Houston-born Smith, a former topless dancer, was notorious for her relationship with the 89-year-old oil tycoon after meeting him at a Texas strip club. They had been married for 14 months when he died in 1995. A federal court in California initially awarded Smith $474 million US, but the decision was later overturned. However, in May 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that she could continue her fight for the Marshall fortune. |
|
|
|
|
Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet. |
Law Firm Directory
|
|