|
|
|
Bush taps Fielding as new White House counsel
Politics |
2007/01/09 10:41
|
US President George Bush announced Tuesday that Fred F. Fielding will serve as the new White House counsel. Fielding, who has advised Bush throughout his presidency and sat on the 9/11 Commission, will replace Harriet Miers, who announced her resignation last week. Bush praised Miers, saying "she has devoted herself to the rule of law and the cause of justice," and called Fielding "uniquely qualified" to replace her. Fielding served as General Counsel to President Reagan from 1981-86 and deputy counsel under President Nixon from 1970-72, and is regarded by observers as having the political experience that Bush may need to face challenges to executive authority from the new Democratically-controlled Congress. Fielding, 67, leaves his position as a partner at Wiley, Rein and Fielding in Washington, DC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Two shot at Joshua Tree law firm still critical
Breaking Legal News |
2007/01/09 10:34
|
JOSHUA TREE, Calif. A sheriff's spokesman says an attorney and another man who were shot repeatedly at a Joshua Tree law firm yesterday remain in critical condition. Attorney Bill Weir and Rocky Favorite were shot multiple times at the J-T Law firm. A San Bernardino County sheriff's spokeswoman says a third victim, 25-year-old Dawn Croom, was hospitalized with a wounded leg but later released. Bernard Steppe was arrested shortly after the shooting for investigation of attempted murder. He's being held at Morongo Basin Jail on 500-thousand dollars bail. Sheriff's spokeswoman Jodi Miller says Steppe lived on the same property as the law firm and may have worked for Weir in the past.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Micron settles DRAM class-action lawsuit
Court Watch |
2007/01/09 08:59
|
Micron Technology Inc. (MU.N: Quote, Profile , Research) said on Tuesday it has settled a class-action lawsuit that will reduce its previously announced first-quarter profit by up to $80 million. The lawsuit, which followed a 2002 U.S. Justice Department inquiry into the memory chip industry, covered people and entities that bought a type of computer memory known as DRAM directly from suppliers from April 1999 through June 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
Marlin Hotel Slapped With NFL Lawsuit
Breaking Legal News |
2007/01/09 08:52
|
MIAMI South Beach’s trendy Marlin Hotel is the target of a lawsuit by the National Football League for allegedly reneging on a deal to supply 13 hotel rooms during the first week of February for the Super Bowl.
It’s the third time that the league has sued a hotel for failing to keep their reservations. Last month, the South Beach Hotel and the Crest Hotel were sued by the NFL for allegedly breaking an agreement to reserve 54 rooms for the league. Both have denied signing a contract to reserve the rooms and have filed lawsuits seeking to stay the arbitration proceedings.
The disputed rooms are only a small portion of the 18,000 rooms secured by the NFL when South Florida won the bid to host Super Bowl XLI. Hotels can boost their profits if they keep their rooms out of the NFL's allotted block and book them at regular rates.
Executives with the NFL and the Marlin Hotel were not immediately available for comment. |
|
|
|
|
|
Supreme Court hears garbage fees case
Breaking Legal News |
2007/01/08 22:34
|
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in United Haulers Association v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority 05-1345, a case concerning whether a local ordinance would violate the Commerce Clause by requiring New York trash haulers to deliver all solid wastes to a publicly owned local facility. Lawyers for the trash companies argued that using out-of-state transfer facilities would cost significantly less than the using the county's mandated facilities. Defense lawyers for the government-owned waste management authority countered that the non-discriminatory government operation of the transfer facilities does not benefit a private company and that the ordinance should thus be allowed to stand; the petitioners point out that the county is in fact profiting from the mandate. The US Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the county. In 1994, the Court held 6-3 in C & A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown that a similar ordinance unconstitutionally restricted interstate commerce; in that instance, the mandated facility was privately owned. The issue now before the court will turn on whether a government-owned facility can be seen as analogous to a profit-seeking private company and thus would be in violation of the Commerce Clause. Five of the six justices who signed the 1994 majority opinion remain on the bench; of the three dissenters, only Justice David Souter remains. |
|
|
|
|
|
Court Denies EchoStar Appeal
Law Center |
2007/01/08 22:33
|
The Supreme Court Monday denied EchoStar's appeal of a lower court decision preventing the company from offering distant network TV station signals to its subscribers. That December 1 cut-off came after a years-long legal tussle with broadcasters over EchoStar's ability to determine with subs were and weren't eligible to recieve the signals. The decision does not affect the ability of EchoStar subs to receive distant signals via outside company National Programming Service. After a federal appeals court mandated the cut-off and NPS was recruited to provide EchoStar subs with distant signals, broadcasters went to court to try to block the move, but were rebuffed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intuitive Surgical faces patent lawsuit from Cal Tech
Court Watch |
2007/01/08 22:32
|
Intuitive Surgical Inc. said Monday the California Institute of Technology filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the company in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The Sunnyvale, Calif.-based medical equipment manufacturer said the lawsuit is without merit and has filed an action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California seeking declaration that the company isn't infringing Cal Tech patents. Intuitive Surgical shares fell $2.88, or 3.06 percent, to close at $91.20 on the Nasdaq Stock Market Monday.
|
|
|
|
|
Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet. |
Law Firm Directory
|
|