|
|
|
Oil giants hit with U.S. gas price-fixing lawsuit
Court Watch |
2007/08/23 08:21
|
A group of California gasoline station owners filed suit in U.S. federal district court in San Francisco accusing three oil industry giants of fixing gasoline prices across the United States from 1998 to 2001. The suit filed on Tuesday claims that Texaco -- now owned by Chevron Corp. -- and U.S. units of state-owned Saudi Aramco of Saudi Arabia and of Royal Dutch Shell Plc colluded to set gasoline sold to 23,000 Texaco and Shell stations at artificially high prices. Chevron is named as a defendant because it took over Texaco. The suit is similar to one filed in 2004 by California gasoline station owners. That case was dismissed last year by the U.S. Supreme Court. Plaintiffs' attorney Joseph M. Alioto of San Francisco said the top U.S. court rejected the former case because it sought to prove only that the three corporations agreed to fix prices. This time, Alioto said, he and his fellow attorneys will attempt to prove unfair competition laws were broken. "All of this started at the Masters Golf Tournament," Alioto told Reuters on Wednesday. "The guy from Shell got a brainstorm while he was watching the pros hit those pebbled balls around and called the CEO of Texaco." Heads of Shell Oil, Texaco and Saudi Refining began meeting monthly in 1996, the lawsuit says. By late 1997, Shell and Texaco were ready to form an alliance but the Saudi representative was not, Alioto said, so Shell and Texaco in January 1998 formed Equilon to refine crude oil and to sell gasoline in 32 states, mainly in the U.S. West and Midwest. By mid-1998, Alioto claims, the Saudis joined with Shell and Texaco and the three formed Motiva for refining crude and selling gasoline in 27 states, mainly in the U.S. Gulf Coast region and the eastern U.S. The suit asks for class-action status. Some stations lost $10,000 or more a month because of what he alleged were practices that raised prices by cutting competition. On Wednesday, Shell Oil representative Sarah Andreani said that Shell, Equilon and Motiva were "carefully and extensively reviewed by the (U.S.) Federal Trade Commission and by several state attorneys general prior to their formation -- and earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a decision that neither Shell nor the joint ventures violated any antitrust law." In 1998, at a time when U.S. crude oil prices dipped to $10 a barrel -- they are near $70 now -- gasoline prices at Texaco and Shell stations rose. "With inflation taken into account, in 1998, oil prices were at their lowest since The Depression," said Alioto. "Both Shell and Texaco (by their U.S. alliance) had substantially reduced their costs. "In the face of these economic factors, they agreed to raise the prices" for gasoline, Alioto said. |
|
|
|
|
|
US judge fines British Air $300 mln in price fixing
Breaking Legal News |
2007/08/23 08:19
|
US judges have accepted a guilty plea from British Airways over its role in a price-fixing cartel. A court sitting in Washington ruled that the airline should be fined $300m (£150m) - a sum previously agreed between BA and the US Department of Justice. Now that the fine has been agreed, attention will turn to whether senior British Airways staff will face criminal investigation for their part in the cartel involving BA and Virgin Airways. The American fine followed a detailed investigation on both sides of the Atlantic. Investigations in the UK were led by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT), which has already fined BA £121.5m. As rival Virgin Atlantic tipped off the OFT about the price-fixing scandal, it was granted immunity. It was the first time that the UK and the US have simultaneously brought action against a company. BA had colluded with Virgin Atlantic on at least six occasions between August 2004 and January 2006, the OFT found. During that time, fuel surcharges rose from £5 to £60 per ticket. BA's chief executive Willie Walsh has insisted that passengers had not been overcharged because fuel surcharges were "a legitimate way of recovering costs". However, he has acknowledged that the conduct of some of the carrier's employees had been wrong and could not be excused. "Anti-competitive behaviour is entirely unacceptable and we condemn it unreservedly," Mr Walsh said earlier this month. In October 2006, BA's commercial director, Martin George, and communications chief, Iain Burns - who had been on leave of absence since the inquiry into the surcharges began - quit the company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roche wins U.S. motion in Ventana bid battle
Business |
2007/08/23 06:21
|
A U.S. court has granted Roche Holding AG's motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent Ventana Medical Systems Inc. from applying an Arizona anti-takeover law to defend itself against Roche's $3 billion hostile takeover bid. The motion was granted by the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Swiss drugmaker Roche said on Wednesday. Roche is seeking to acquire Tucson, Arizona-based Ventana, which makes diagnostic tests, for $75 a share. Ventana had wanted to apply an Arizona law that makes it harder for companies to be bought, but the judge ruled that it could not use that law, Roche said. In a separate case, Roche is also contesting a so-called poison pill defense by Ventana, which would give Ventana shareholders rights to buy new shares at half price if Roche acquires 20 percent of the company. Roche said on Tuesday it extended by four weeks the expiry of its tender offer to September 20 from August 23. |
|
|
|
|
|
Delphi Corp. Class Action Plaintiffs: Agreement Reached
Class Action |
2007/08/23 04:27
|
Plaintiffs in a class action against Delphi Corp. (DPHIQ) said they reached an agreement with the Troy, Mich., auto parts maker, which is currently in bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11. A law firm for the plaintiffs said the terms of the proposed agreement include a comprehensive settlement with Delphi's insurers. The firm said the terms of the settlement are currently confidential. The agreement is still pending approval by the bankruptcy court. A spokesman for Delphi could not be reached immediately for comment. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan hopes to pick his prison
Legal Business |
2007/08/23 04:22
|
At the same time that former Gov. George Ryan wages a last-ditch battle to overturn his federal fraud conviction, he is wrangling for his choice of federal prisons should the appeal fail. Prison officials assigned Ryan to the Federal Prison Camp in Duluth, Minn. But Ryan has asked officials to reassign him to a similar facility in Oxford, Wis., Ryan's attorney, former Gov. James Thompson, said Wednesday.
The conditions would be comparable, but the Wisconsin facility is closer to family, Thompson said.
"His wife is elderly, and it will not be easy for her to make a trip in any event," said Thompson, speaking after a hearing Wednesday in federal court in Chicago.
"If there is some rule that prohibits him from going to Oxford, then I suppose they would have to make the trip to Duluth, which is twice as far," Thompson said.
On Tuesday, a three-judge panel of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Ryan's appeal in a 2-1 vote, but it allowed him to remain free on bail while the full court -- made up of 11 judges -- decides whether to review the decision.
At the hearing Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer ruled that if the full court declines to hear the appeal, Ryan and co-defendant Lawrence Warner must report to prison within four business days after the appellate court issues its official order.
That official order probably would come within seven days after the full court's decision was announced, lawyers said.
Ryan was convicted in April 2006 on charges that as secretary of state and governor, he doled out sweetheart deals to Warner and other friends and used state resources and employees for political gain.
Ryan was sentenced to 6 1/2 years in prison, while Warner, who also was convicted, was sentenced to almost 3 1/2 years.
The Federal Bureau of Prisons considers requests to place a criminal defendant in a particular prison but doesn't comment publicly on pending requests, spokesman Michael Truman said Wednesday.
Prison officials, he said, decide placement by looking at the space available and factors such as an inmate's age, security designation, length of sentence, history of violence or need for substance-abuse treatment.
Federal prison camps have dormitory-style housing and limited or no fencing, Truman said. Warner, a businessman and Ryan confidant, has been assigned to a federal facility in Colorado, his lawyers said in court. In papers filed Tuesday before the court allowed him to remain free on bail, Warner sought to delay his surrender because of upcoming cataract surgery.
At the hearing on Wednesday, Thompson argued that if Ryan's latest appeal failed, he would need time to put his affairs in order.
But Assistant U.S. Atty. Joel Levin said 72 hours should be enough and that no further court hearings would be needed.
"It seems to me that now is the time the arrangements need to be made," Levin told the judge. "We shouldn't be back in front of you."
Ryan's hopes for a hearing by the full court were buoyed by a blistering dissent by Judge Michael Kanne, who said juror controversies marred the historic six-month trial and deprived Ryan and Warner of a fair trial.
The full appellate court probably will decide whether to hear Ryan's appeal within six to eight weeks. If they decide to take the case, they may take several more months to read the briefs, hold an oral argument and render a decision.
If the appeal fails, Ryan could ask the U.S. Supreme Court to take his case and grant him bail while the matter is pending, Thompson said. But the nation's highest court agrees to hear very few cases.
Thompson didn't rule out seeking a presidential pardon if the Supreme Court refused to take the case, though he said that option hasn't been given any consideration at this point. |
|
|
|
|
|
Google unveils high Sky
Venture Business News |
2007/08/23 02:07
|
Google Earth users will be able to look zoom far beyond planet Earth. At its Pittsburgh office, Mountain View, Calif.-based Google Inc. on Wednesday unveiled Sky, a new component of Google Earth that allows users to browse and view what's in the sky. With Sky, users can zoom in on the moon, planets, stars, constellations and galaxies. Some include image photos and information bars. With a click, someone zooming in on Pittsburgh could reverse the image and see what stars can currently be seen from Pittsburgh. Users can also advance in time to see where planets will be located on a given date or when a meteor shower will occur. "(We've taken) terabytes of data and made it easily accessible to anyone," said Andrew Connolly, an associate professor in the Department of Astronomy at the University of Washington and a visiting faculty member. "We are hoping astronomers around the world will share it (information) with everybody." Sky was developed by Google's Pittsburgh office, which was opened in 2006 and now has more than 50 engineers, according to Andrew Moore, director of Google's Pittsburgh Engineering Office. The idea stemmed from a Google visiting faculty program with the University of Washington. "Google Pittsburgh engineers made it possible," Connolly said. According to Moore, Google's Pittsburgh office is primarily focused on Google infrastructure, computer understanding of text, developing systems for detecting fraud and advertising quality. Engineers worked on the Sky project during so-called 20 percent time, where employees can spend 20 percent of their time working on a project of their choice. "Today is an example of 20 percent time," Moore said in reference to the Sky project unveiling. "(They do) cool, fun, interesting things on the side." |
|
|
|
|
|
PETA's call in wake of Vick plea plan has merit
Practice Focuses |
2007/08/23 01:24
|
No matter how you feel about Michael Vick or the folks at People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), only a drooling, spiral-eyed sadist would insist that drowning, hanging or electrocuting innocent dogs should be an unpunishable offense, let alone allowing them to rip each other to shreds for fun and profit. Guilty dogs should be included in that statement, too. Now that Vick will cop a guilty plea in a federal dogfighting case loaded with allegations of such hideous, heartless behavior, PETA is calling for the public's assistance in demanding that the NFL add cruelty to animals "in all its forms" to the list of offenses in the league's code of personal conduct. The organization's Web site cites three prior cases -- Falcon tackle Jonathan Babineaux accused in February of beating his girlfriend's pit bull, which later died; ex-Packers/Cardinals/Giants running back LeShon Johnson found guilty in 2004 of involvement in a dogfighting ring; and former Eagles running back Thomas Hamner charged in 2001 with beating his dog. If there's any cosmic justice for all of those poor pooches, Commissioner Roger Goodell will listen to PETA's minions. Of course, if he acts according to PETA's standards, he'll have to suspend a big chunk of the league. PETA is steadfastly against using animals for food, clothing, experimentation, entertainment or "any other purpose" and the NFL is home to more than a few players who avidly "enjoy" hunting. Yep, hunting. Don't think that widely-accepted recreational activity is cruel? That deer or rabbit that just had a shell or arrow put into it and crawled off to bleed to death in the brush will beg to differ, as will the buffalo, boar, elk and more that are sitting ducks in enclosed areas on so-called "canned hunt" farms. And if you go by PETA's standards, fishing is a no-go, too. Think that bass enjoys that hook in the roof of its mouth while it's hauled gasping out of the drink? I know. Get a grip, Rolfe. Personally, I've never understood what's so enjoyable about killing things. The chance to spend time in the great outdoors? Take a hike, son. For food and clothing? Unless you live in the wild, God invented supermarkets, falafel stands and fabrics just for you, Jack. Before we go any further, I plead guilty to sitting at the groaning board each night, belching contentedly as I toss bones over my shoulder. I know that the animals I consume are raised and killed in hellish conditions. It's amazing what a little barbecue sauce can do to a man's conscience. I pass a sheep farm every day and when I think about chasing one of those cute, wooly critters around with a big ol' fork, I realize I'm just a goldplated candy ass who would be slaughtering and butchering fruits and vegetables -- exclusively -- if I had to slaughter and butcher my own meat. I've heard the arguments that hunting helps control certain populations, such as deer, that would otherwise take a big nasty hit from disease and starvation. But whether it comes at the hands of Mother Nature or mankind, cruelty is cruelty. Is cruelty merely defined by the manner and circumstance in which pain and death are inflicted on animals? You bet. So, the NFL's avid hunters and fishers can rest easy, not that the league would ever bow to PETA's standards. After all, this is the ultimate meat-eater league in a sport where tales of coaches strangling a bulldog (Harvard's Percy Haughton in 1908) or having a bull castrated in front of players (Mississippi State's Jackie Sherrill in 1992) to inspire their ferocity are legendary if not always true, as in the case of Haughton. But, in the wake of the Vick case, PETA's plea deserves a sincere nod in the form of stern warnings and penalties from the NFL. The general legal definition of cruelty used by the Humane Society and state chapters of the Society For Prevention of Cruelty to Animals is a reasonable place to start: "Any act of violence or neglect against an animal, causing unnecessary and extreme pain or suffering and death." At the very least, exactly what those acts are should be food for thought. |
|
|
|
|
Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet. |
Law Firm Directory
|
|