|
|
|
Ore. court rejects car salesman in ethics appeal
Breaking Legal News |
2009/08/21 10:47
|
A manager at an Oregon car dealership said he was fired because he insisted on being an honest salesman. The state supreme court disagreed Thursday.
Kevin Lamson argued he was wrongfully discharged from Crater Lake Motors in Medford after he told his bosses he wanted no part of a sales campaign that he believed included deceptive ads and sales practices. Lamson sued the dealership and won in trial court, but the Oregon Supreme Court reversed the decision. It said in a unanimous opinion Thursday that there was no evidence to support Lamson's claim he was fired for reporting the practices. He had been at the dealership for 15 years when Crater Lake Motors contracted with another company, Real Performance Marketing, to hold a special weeklong sales event for used cars. Lamson said he observed sales tactics he believed to be unethical and illegal, including "payment packing" by inflating monthly payments with life insurance and service contracts without the customer's knowledge. When the dealership decided to hold a second sales event with the same company, Lamson complained to upper management in person and in two letters. |
|
|
|
|
|
NYC judge returns investor lawsuits to state court
Breaking Legal News |
2009/08/21 06:46
|
A judge has rejected mortgage lender Countrywide Financial's effort to have some investor lawsuits heard in federal court.
Judge Richard Holwell in Manhattan concluded in a decision released Tuesday that Congress did not intend for a federal court to hear a dispute over the mortgage lender's promise to buy back modified loans from investors. He returned the case to state court. Holwell wrote that it was tempting to find federal jurisdiction every time a multibillion dollar case with national implications arrives at the court's doorstep. But he said the decision is ultimately left up to Congress. Holders of mortgage-backed securities sued Countrywide in December. Shirley Norton, a spokeswoman for Bank of America Corp., Countrywide's parent company, said the company will appeal the decision. |
|
|
|
|
|
Court tosses Calif. law on payments to Armenians
Breaking Legal News |
2009/08/21 05:47
|
A federal appeals court invalidated a California law Thursday that allowed heirs of Armenians killed in the Turkish Ottoman Empire nearly a century ago to seek payment on the life insurance policies of dead relatives.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the law amounted to unconstitutional meddling in U.S. foreign policy. It based its 2-1 ruling on a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down another California law designed to help Holocaust survivors collect on Nazi-era insurance policies. The federal government does not recognize the mass killings of Armenians during World War I as genocide, but the California Legislature did in 2000 when it enacted the disputed law. About half of the people of Armenian descent living in this country reside in California. Lawyer Brian Kabateck, who represents Armenian-American heirs, plans to appeal. "The ruling is wrong. It's a disaster," Kabateck said. "The one million Armenians that live in California today have been told by the court that even the use of the word 'genocide' by a government is illegal." |
|
|
|
|
|
Man Charged In Milwaukee Mayor Beating
Criminal Law |
2009/08/20 11:44
|
Prosecutors have charged the 20-year-old man accused of attacking Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett Saturday night with first-degree reckless injury, theft, disorderly conduct and bail jumping.
According to the criminal complaint, Barrett and his family members were walking on West Orchard Street from the State Fair to their car when they encountered Anthony Peters trying to get his 1-year-old daughter from her grandmother. The grandmother was screaming for someone to call 911. The mayor went to call 911 and when he did, Peters became "irate and charged" Barrett, demanding he hang up the phone. According to Barrett's niece, Moira Flood, Peters then approached the mayor, swatted the phone from his hand and punched him twice in the face and once in the stomach. Barrett punched Peters in the face. According to the complaint, Peters then pulled out a club or a baton out of his pocket and continued to threaten to kill Barrett and then struck him in the face and head with the club. After Barrett fell to the ground, Peters continued to hit him with the club. Flood told police Peters struck Barrett about six times while he was on the ground. Flood then called 911 and Peters ran, according to the complaint. Peters is currently in the Milwaukee County Jail. A public defender was appointed to his case Thursday morning. |
|
|
|
|
|
Wells Fargo sued over home equity lines of credit
Business |
2009/08/19 10:34
|
The banking unit of Wells Fargo & Co. is facing a lawsuit claiming it illegally reduced the size of customers' home equity lines of credit.
The suit, which was filed in Illinois, claims Wells Fargo failed to accurately assess the value of customers' houses before deciding to cut the size of their credit lines. San Francisco-based Wells Fargo is being accused of using unreliable computer models that wrongly valued home prices too low to justify cutting the size of customers' loans. Home equity lines of credit are similar to credit cards in that a customer has a credit limit and can continue to borrow money until the limit is reached. Once a portion is paid off, it again becomes accessible to borrow. But, home equity lines of credit are backed by a borrower's property, whereas credit cares are unsecured. Michael Hickman, who filed the lawsuit on behalf of himself and is seeking class action status for it, claims Wells Fargo also did not provide proper notice that the bank was reducing the size of the credit lines. The bank's notice for reducing the lines also did not specifically provide a new estimated value for the property or the method used to determine the houses value. Hickman's lawsuit said that information was needed so a customer could challenge the change in the credit limit and try and reinstate the previous limit. Hickman is being represented by KamberEdelson LLC, a Chicago-based law firm, which is also representing clients that have filed similar suits against JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc. Nearly all banks have been hit hard by mounting loan losses tied to residential real estate over the past two years. Reducing lines of credit can limit exposure to the struggling sector. |
|
|
|
|
|
Judge Upholds Merck's Singulair Patent
Patent Law |
2009/08/19 10:32
|
A U.S. judge has upheld a patent for Merck & Co.'s best-selling product, the asthma and allergy medication Singulair, handing Merck a victory in its battle to ward off early generic competition for the drug.
Wednesday's ruling by Judge Garrett Brown in federal court in Trenton, N.J., means that Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., the Israeli generics manufacturer that challenged the Singulair patent, won't be able to start selling copycat versions in the U.S. until the expiration of patent protection in 2012. Teva could, however, appeal the decision in an effort to sell copies before then. Singulair was the ninth best-selling prescription drug in the world last year, according to drug-data provider IMS Health. For the six months ended June 30, world-wide sales rose 6% to $2.3 billion. U.S. sales--those directly at stake in the Teva patent dispute--rose 6% to $1.5 billion in the first half of 2009. Many analysts and legal observers thought Merck had the upper hand in the case because Singulair was an innovative approach to treating asthma when it hit the market in 1998. But at a February trial in Trenton, Teva lawyers argued that the patent for Singulair was invalid because prior research would have taught anyone skilled in the art of drug development how to invent Singulair. Under patent law, so-called prior art can be grounds for invalidating a patent's claims. Teva also argued the patent was unenforceable because Merck misled the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office when it applied for the patent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas judge's death-row appeal testimony to resume
Breaking Legal News |
2009/08/19 09:32
|
A Texas judge criticized for closing her court with a condemned man's last appeal in the works is set to resume testifying at her ethics trial.
Judge Sharon Keller is telling her side of the story for the first time nearly two years after Michael Wayne Richard was executed. She'll continue testifying Wednesday. She was first called Tuesday to answer questions about refusing to keep the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals open past 5 p.m. when Richard's lawyers asked for more time to file their rushed appeal on Sept. 25, 2007. Keller says the move wasn't a ruling on the merits of the request. She says she received a call shortly before court closed about an appeal running late and that she knew it concerned the execution but that no explanation was given. |
|
|
|
|
Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet. |
Law Firm Directory
|
|