Today's Date: Add To Favorites
The Korean Paper Firms Deny US Dumping Claims
World Business News | 2006/11/25

The Korean paper industry Thursday denied a claim made in the United States that it is unfairly receiving state subsidies and exporting its products at a low price.

Officials said that their products are sold in the U.S. at higher prices than in Korea, after NewPage Corporation, a leading paper manufacturer in the U.S., filed a complaint last month to the Department of Commerce, which decided to launch an anti-dumping and countervailing investigation into Korean, Chinese and Indonesian ``coated wood-free paper.’’

The value-added printing paper is generally used for the production of brochures, calendars and albums.

Seven Korean paper firms are being targeted by the investigation _ Hansol, EN Paper, Kyesung, Hongwon, Hankuk, Moorim and Namhan.

Contrary to the U.S. claim, the price of Korean papers sold in the U.S. is higher than those marketed in the country, said an official with Moorim Paper, which is monitoring the affair. ``Thus, U.S. anti-dumping measures are not applicable to Korea.’’

Unlike China and Indonesia which export their papers to the U.S. at a low price, Korea has priced its papers in the U.S. at a high level over the years due to weak domestic spending.

Korean papers were also caught in the middle of heavy competition amid low-priced Chinese products coming into the U.S.

The official believes that the U.S. has included Korea along with other Asian rivals in this antidumping matter for several reasons _ Korea is one of Asia’s big exporters to the U.S., and it would seem unfair just to investigate two Asian countries.

Additionally, since NewPage is losing its competitive edge in the U.S. market against the rising forces of Asian paper manufacturers, the company is trying to dump its low market share blame on them.

Last year, Korea shipped some 378,000 tons of writing and printing paper to the U.S., recording about $315 million in sales last year.

Sales of Korean paper reached $181 million in the first six months of this year.

Korean paper makes up the largest Asian share of total U.S. paper imports, accounting for about 26 percent, followed by China with 14 percent and Indonesia with 3 percent, according to the Trade Ministry in Seoul.

The country has been seeing its paper sales in the U.S. steadily rising since 2003.

Regarding the U.S. countervailing drive, industry officials said the Korean paper industry does not either receive special treatment or special subsidies as the U.S. claims.

``Like any other industry, when we do ask for government support, its a loan,’’ said the Moorim official. ``The U.S. countervailing probe on Korean papers is a direct challenge against Korea’s state policy.’’

He said the domestic paper industry will comply with the investigation in coordination with the Trade Ministry, while continuing to express Korea’s stance on the matter to the U.S.

Under the World Trade Organization regulations, the Department of Commerce has 18 months to decide whether to levy duties on Asian companies for alleged damages caused to the U.S. firm.

Robin Sheen
Staff Reporter



[PREV] [1] ..[8236][8237][8238][8239][8240][8241][8242][8243][8244].. [8292] [NEXT]
All
Class Action
Bankruptcy
Biotech
Breaking Legal News
Business
Corporate Governance
Court Watch
Criminal Law
Health Care
Human Rights
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Law Center
Law Promo News
Legal Business
Legal Marketing
Litigation
Medical Malpractice
Mergers & Acquisitions
Political and Legal
Politics
Practice Focuses
Securities
Elite Lawyers
Tax
Featured Law Firms
Tort Reform
Venture Business News
World Business News
Law Firm News
Attorneys in the News
Events and Seminars
Environmental
Legal Careers News
Patent Law
Consumer Rights
International
Legal Spotlight
Current Cases
State Class Actions
Federal Class Actions
New Hampshire courts hear 2 ..
PA high court orders countie..
Tight US House races in Cali..
North Carolina Attorney Gene..
Republicans take Senate majo..
What to know about the unpre..
A man who threatened to kill..
Ford cuts 2024 earnings guid..
Kenya’s deputy president pl..
South Korean court acquits f..
Supreme Court grapples with ..
Supreme Court leaves in plac..
Kentucky sheriff accused of ..
New rules regarding election..
North Carolina appeals court..


Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet.
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Lorain Elyria Divorce Lawyer
www.loraindivorceattorney.com
Legal Document Services in Los Angeles, CA
Best Legal Document Preparation
www.tllsg.com
Car Accident Lawyers
Sunnyvale, CA Personal Injury Attorney
www.esrajunglaw.com
East Greenwich Family Law Attorney
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Connecticut Special Education Lawyer
www.fortelawgroup.com
  Law Firm Directory
 
 
 
© ClassActionTimes.com. All rights reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Class Action Times as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Affordable Law Firm Web Design