Today's Date: Add To Favorites
Refill Ink Maker Downplays HP Court Attack
World Business News | 2006/11/10

InkTec, a leading refill ink seller based in South Korea, remained confident after U.S. giant Hewlett-Packard (HP) allegedly accused its German partner of violating ink cartridge patents in Germany.

``The product being debated provides a very small portion of our revenue. It is outdated. Our new products are all patent-free,’’ said an InkTec official on Friday over the phone. `Also, the patent is registered in a few countries so it won’t cause big damage to us.’’

The official said that it will give appropriate support for the German partner regarding the court battle with HP even though it is not legally responsible.

InkTec was founded in 1992 to manufacture commercial electronic ink products in Korea. It was the first company in Korea to adopt the refill cartridge system for printers.

On Thursday, HP said that it has filed a formal complaint in Germany alleging that InkTec’s ``do-it-yourself’’ ink refill kits are violating its patents. The company has sued several other companies in the Untied States and China since last year regarding the ink patents.

``With more than 4,000 supply patents, representing a deep heritage of innovation, research and development, HP will continue to vigorously defend intellectual property violations wherever and whenever they are discovered,’’ said Pradeep Jotwani, senior vice president of HP.

Major printer makers such as HP, Canon and Epson have been blamed by consumer groups for taking enormous profits from selling ink cartridges at high prices.

An interesting report from Gizmodo, an IT Web site, showed that the HP’s ink, which is being sold at $0.70 per milliliter, costs more than human blood, which is about $0.40 for the same amount.

Several civil organizations and environmentalist have held rallies in front of government buildings this year, demanding the government to encourage wider use of refill inks.

By Nick Roset
Staff Reporter



[PREV] [1] ..[8264][8265][8266][8267][8268][8269][8270][8271][8272].. [8300] [NEXT]
All
Class Action
Bankruptcy
Biotech
Breaking Legal News
Business
Corporate Governance
Court Watch
Criminal Law
Health Care
Human Rights
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Labor & Employment
Law Center
Law Promo News
Legal Business
Legal Marketing
Litigation
Medical Malpractice
Mergers & Acquisitions
Political and Legal
Politics
Practice Focuses
Securities
Elite Lawyers
Tax
Featured Law Firms
Tort Reform
Venture Business News
World Business News
Law Firm News
Attorneys in the News
Events and Seminars
Environmental
Legal Careers News
Patent Law
Consumer Rights
International
Legal Spotlight
Current Cases
State Class Actions
Federal Class Actions
Amazon workers strike at mul..
TikTok asks Supreme Court to..
Supreme Court rejects Wiscon..
US inflation ticked up last ..
Court seems reluctant to blo..
Court will hear arguments ov..
Romanian court orders a reco..
Court backs Texas over razor..
New Hampshire courts hear 2 ..
PA high court orders countie..
Tight US House races in Cali..
North Carolina Attorney Gene..
Republicans take Senate majo..
What to know about the unpre..
A man who threatened to kill..


Class action or a representative action is a form of lawsuit in which a large group of people collectively bring a claim to court and/or in which a class of defendants is being sued. This form of collective lawsuit originated in the United States and is still predominantly a U.S. phenomenon, at least the U.S. variant of it. In the United States federal courts, class actions are governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule. Since 1938, many states have adopted rules similar to the FRCP. However, some states like California have civil procedure systems which deviate significantly from the federal rules; the California Codes provide for four separate types of class actions. As a result, there are two separate treatises devoted solely to the complex topic of California class actions. Some states, such as Virginia, do not provide for any class actions, while others, such as New York, limit the types of claims that may be brought as class actions. They can construct your law firm a brand new website, lawyer website templates and help you redesign your existing law firm site to secure your place in the internet.
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Lorain Elyria Divorce Lawyer
www.loraindivorceattorney.com
Legal Document Services in Los Angeles, CA
Best Legal Document Preparation
www.tllsg.com
Car Accident Lawyers
Sunnyvale, CA Personal Injury Attorney
www.esrajunglaw.com
East Greenwich Family Law Attorney
Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
www.jantonfamilylaw.com/about
St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
St. Charles DUI Attorney
www.lynchlawonline.com
Connecticut Special Education Lawyer
www.fortelawgroup.com
  Law Firm Directory
 
 
 
© ClassActionTimes.com. All rights reserved.

The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Class Action Times as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Affordable Law Firm Web Design